Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015:2015:539835.
doi: 10.1155/2015/539835. Epub 2015 Apr 6.

A new approach to define and diagnose cardiometabolic disorder in children

Affiliations

A new approach to define and diagnose cardiometabolic disorder in children

Lars Bo Andersen et al. J Diabetes Res. 2015.

Abstract

The aim of the study was to test the performance of a new definition of metabolic syndrome (MetS), which better describes metabolic dysfunction in children. Methods. 15,794 youths aged 6-18 years participated. Mean z-score for CVD risk factors was calculated. Sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate which parameters best described the metabolic dysfunction by analysing the score against independent variables not included in the score. Results. More youth had clustering of CVD risk factors (>6.2%) compared to the number selected by existing MetS definitions (International Diabetes Federation (IDF) < 1%). Waist circumference and BMI were interchangeable, but using insulin resistance homeostasis model assessment (HOMA) instead of fasting glucose increased the score. The continuous MetS score was increased when cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) and leptin were included. A mean z-score of 0.40-0.85 indicated borderline and above 0.85 indicated clustering of risk factors. A noninvasive risk score based on adiposity and CRF showed sensitivity and specificity of 0.85 and an area under the curve of 0.92 against IDF definition of MetS. Conclusions. Diagnosis for MetS in youth can be improved by using continuous variables for risk factors and by including CRF and leptin.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Odds ratios of observed number of children with 4 or 5 risk factors divided with expected number for each cohort.

References

    1. Reaven G. M. Banting lecture 1988. Role of insulin resistance in human disease. Diabetes. 1988;37(12):1595–1607. - PubMed
    1. Simmons R. K., Alberti K. G. M. M., Gale E. A. M., et al. The metabolic syndrome: useful concept or clinical tool? Report of a WHO expert consultation. Diabetologia. 2010;53(4):600–605. doi: 10.1007/s00125-009-1620-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Alberti K., Zimmet P. Definition, diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus and its complications. Part 1: diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Provisional report of a WHO Consultation. Diabetic Medicine. 1998;15(7):539–553. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1096-9136(199807)15:7x003C;539::aid-dia668x0003e;3.0.co;2-s. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Grundy S. M., Brewer H. B., Jr., Cleeman J. I., Smith S. C., Jr., Lenfant C. Definition of metabolic syndrome: Report of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute/American Heart Association conference on scientific issues related to definition. Circulation. 2004;109(3):433–438. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000111245.75752.c6. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Alberti K. G., Zimmet P., Shaw J. The metabolic syndrome—a new worldwide definition. The Lancet. 2005;366(9491):1059–1062. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(05)67402-8. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources