Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015 May 7;19(1):214.
doi: 10.1186/s13054-015-0938-1.

A comprehensive method to develop a checklist to increase safety of intra-hospital transport of critically ill patients

Affiliations
Review

A comprehensive method to develop a checklist to increase safety of intra-hospital transport of critically ill patients

Anja H Brunsveld-Reinders et al. Crit Care. .

Abstract

Introduction: Transport of critically ill patients from the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) to other departments for diagnostic or therapeutic procedures is often a necessary part of the critical care process. Transport of critically ill patients is potentially dangerous with up to 70% adverse events occurring. The aim of this study was to develop a checklist to increase safety of intra-hospital transport (IHT) in critically ill patients.

Method: A three-step approach was used to develop an IHT checklist. First, various databases were searched for published IHT guidelines and checklists. Secondly, prospectively collected IHT incidents in the LUMC ICU were analyzed. Thirdly, interviews were held with physicians and nurses over their experiences of IHT incidents. Following this approach a checklist was developed and discussed with experts in the field. Finally, feasibility and usability of the checklist was tested.

Results: Eleven existing guidelines and five checklists were found. Only one checklist covered all three phases: pre-, during- and post-transport. Recommendations and checklist items mostly focused on the pre-transport phase. Documented incidents most frequently related to patient physiology and equipment malfunction and occurred most often during transport. Discussing the incidents with ICU physicians and ICU nurses resulted in important recommendations such as the introduction of a standard checklist and improved communication with the other departments. This approach resulted in a generally applicable checklist, adaptable for local circumstances. Feedback from nurses using the checklist were positive, the fill in time was 4.5 minutes per phase.

Conclusion: A comprehensive way to develop an intra-hospital checklist for safe transport of ICU patients to another department is described. This resulted in a checklist which is a framework to guide physicians and nurses through intra-hospital transports and provides a continuity of care to enhance patient safety. Other hospitals can customize this checklist to their own situation using the methods proposed in this paper.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Newly developed Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), checklist side one. i.v., intravenous; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; EtCO2, end tidal CO2; HME, heat and moisture exchanger; ET/TT, endotracheal tube/tracheal tube; PDMS, Patient Data Management System.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Newly developed Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) checklist, side two. i.v., intravenous; HR, heartrate; BP, bloodpressure; MAP, mean aterial pressure; CVP, central venous pressure; PAP, pulmonary artery pressure; Vent mode, ventilation mode; FIO2, fraction of inspired oxygen; PEEP/PS, postive end-expiratory pressure/pressure support; RR, respiratory rate; SpO2, peripheral capillary oxygen saturation; EtCO2, end tidal CO2; GCS, Glasgow coma scale; PDMS, Patient Data Management System; HME, heat and moisture exchanger.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Day D. Keeping patients safe during intrahospital transport. Crit Care Nurse. 2010;30:18–32. doi: 10.4037/ccn2010446. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Caruana M, Culp K. Intrahospital transport of the critically ill adult: a research review and implications. Dimens Crit Care Nurs. 1998;17:146–56. doi: 10.1097/00003465-199805000-00005. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Waydhas C. Intrahospital transport of critically ill patients. Crit Care. 1999;3:R83–9. doi: 10.1186/cc362. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lahner D, Nikolic A, Marhofer P, Koinig H, Germann P, Weinstabl C, et al. Incidence of complications in intrahospital transport of critically ill patients–experience in an Austrian university hospital. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2007;119:412–6. doi: 10.1007/s00508-007-0813-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Taylor JO, Chulay, Landers CF, Hood W, Jr, Abelman WH. Monitoring high-risk cardiac patients during transportation in hospital. Lancet. 1970;2:1205–8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(70)92176-8. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms