Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Oct 29;7(3):1-7.
doi: 10.5539/gjhs.v7n3p1.

The perceived information in obtained from the informed consent in Iranian patients with cancer in clinical studies

Affiliations

The perceived information in obtained from the informed consent in Iranian patients with cancer in clinical studies

Sharzad Ghiyasvandian et al. Glob J Health Sci. .

Abstract

Objective: One of the basic issues in clinical studies is to receive the informed consent; that is to say, all the activities applied in patient's involvement in the information, decision-making, ability and volunteering in diagnosis, cure and care. In as much as most cancer patients require information about their individual needs, the present study is conducted to determine the perceived information from the informed consent of clinical studies in cancer patients.

Methods: This is a descriptive study. Fifty cancer patients hospitalized for participating in the clinical study was chosen according to the convenience sampling. Tools used in this research included the questionnaire (individual and social features) and the check list about patient's right and cancer patient's information before and after receiving informed consent in clinical studies (10 items on a Likert rating scale). To validate the study, content and formal validation was used. Data in this research were analyzed using descriptive statistics (frequency, mean and standard deviation) and the software of SPSS 16.

Result: In general, the mean of the scores obtained from cancer patients' perceived information before completing the informed consent of the clinical studies was 14 ± 3.5 and after consent of the clinical studies was 16 ± 2.4. The cancer patients' perceived information before and after consent of the clinical studies was weak.

Conclusions: Based on the findings of the present study, the rate of the information the cancer patients received, before completing the informed consent form, was low, but after completing the informed consent form this rate was again low. Therefore, conducting similar and wider studies is recommended to unveil the factors affecting perceiving information and how to promote the quality of the informed consent in other hospitals in Iran.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interests

There are no conflicts.

Similar articles

References

    1. Afolabi M. O, Okebe J. U, McGrath N, Larson H. J, Bojang K, Chandramohan D. Informed consent comprehension in African research settings. Tropical Medicine & International Health. 2014;19(6):625–642. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tmi.12288 . - PubMed
    1. Cervo S, Rovina J, Talamini R, Perin T, Canzonieri V, De Paoli P, Steffan A. An effective multisource informed consent procedure for research and clinical practice: an observational study of patient understanding and awareness of their roles as research stakeholders in a cancer biobank. BMC medical ethics. 2013;14(1):30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6939-14-30 . - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cresswell P, Gilmour J. The informed consent process in randomised controlled trials: a nurse-led process. Nursing praxis in New Zealand inc. 2014;30(1):17–28. - PubMed
    1. Degerliyurt K, Gunsolley J. C, Laskin D. M. Informed consent: what do patients really want to know? Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2010;68(8):1849–1852. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2010.04.004 . - PubMed
    1. Dry S, Grody W. W, Papagni P. Stuck Between a Scalpel and a Rock, or Molecular Pathology and Legal-Ethical Issues in Use of Tissues for Clinical Care and Research What Must a Pathologist Know? American journal of clinical pathology. 2012;137(3):346–355. http://dx.doi.org/10.1309/AJCPS26UKHNYCEAV . - PubMed