Should Health Numeracy Be Assessed Objectively or Subjectively?
- PMID: 25948493
- PMCID: PMC4636483
- DOI: 10.1177/0272989X15584332
Should Health Numeracy Be Assessed Objectively or Subjectively?
Abstract
Introduction: Because current evidence suggests that numeracy affects how people make decisions, it is an important factor to account for in studies assessing the effectiveness of medical decision support interventions. Subjective and objective numeracy assessment methods are available that vary in theoretical background, skills assessed, known relationship with decision making skills, and ease of implementation. The best way to use these tools to assess numeracy when conducting medical decision-making research is currently unknown.
Methods: We conducted Internet surveys comparing numeracy assessments obtained using the subjective numeracy scale (SNS) and 5 objective numeracy scales. Each study participant completed the SNS and 1 objective numeracy measure. Following each assessment, participants indicated willingness to repeat the assessment and rated its user acceptability.
Results: The overall response rate was 78%, resulting in a total sample size of 673. Spearman correlations between the SNS and the objective numeracy measures ranged from 0.19 to 0.44. Acceptability assessments for the short form of the Numeracy Understanding in Medicine Instrument and the SNS did not differ significantly. The other objective scales all had lower acceptability ratings than the SNS.
Conclusions: These findings are consistent with prior research suggesting that objective and subjective numeracy scales measure related but distinct constructs. Due to current uncertainty regarding which construct is more likely to influence the effectiveness of decision support interventions, these findings warrant further investigation to determine the proper use of objective versus subjective numeracy assessments in medical decision-making research. Pending additional information, a reasonable approach is to measure both objective and subjective numeracy so that the full range of actual and perceived numeracy skills can be taken into account.
Keywords: decision aids; informed medical decision making; numeracy; risk communication.
© The Author(s) 2015.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Validation of the Subjective Numeracy Scale: effects of low numeracy on comprehension of risk communications and utility elicitations.Med Decis Making. 2007 Sep-Oct;27(5):663-71. doi: 10.1177/0272989X07303824. Epub 2007 Jul 24. Med Decis Making. 2007. PMID: 17652180
-
Measuring numeracy without a math test: development of the Subjective Numeracy Scale.Med Decis Making. 2007 Sep-Oct;27(5):672-80. doi: 10.1177/0272989X07304449. Epub 2007 Jul 19. Med Decis Making. 2007. PMID: 17641137
-
Subjective numeracy scale as a tool for assessing statistical numeracy in older adult populations.Gerontology. 2013;59(3):283-8. doi: 10.1159/000345797. Epub 2013 Feb 6. Gerontology. 2013. PMID: 23391745
-
Designing Visual Aids That Promote Risk Literacy: A Systematic Review of Health Research and Evidence-Based Design Heuristics.Hum Factors. 2017 Jun;59(4):582-627. doi: 10.1177/0018720817690634. Epub 2017 Feb 13. Hum Factors. 2017. PMID: 28192674
-
Empirical relationships between numeracy and treatment decision making: A scoping review of the literature.Patient Educ Couns. 2016 Mar;99(3):310-325. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2015.10.002. Epub 2015 Oct 14. Patient Educ Couns. 2016. PMID: 26519238
Cited by
-
Differential relationships between self-reported and performance-based health literacy measures and health-related quality of life: A cross-sectional study.Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Jul 18;104(29):e43458. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000043458. Medicine (Baltimore). 2025. PMID: 40696663 Free PMC article.
-
Numeracy and Understanding of Quantitative Aspects of Predictive Models: A Pilot Study.Appl Clin Inform. 2018 Jul;9(3):683-692. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1669457. Epub 2018 Aug 29. Appl Clin Inform. 2018. PMID: 30157500 Free PMC article.
-
Role of Psychosocial Factors and Health Literacy in Pregnant Women's Intention to Use a Decision Aid for Down Syndrome Screening: A Theory-Based Web Survey.J Med Internet Res. 2016 Oct 28;18(10):e283. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6362. J Med Internet Res. 2016. PMID: 27793792 Free PMC article.
-
Use of a Meter With Color-Range Indicators and a Mobile Diabetes Management App Improved Glycemic Control and Patient Satisfaction in an Underserved Hispanic Population: "Tu Salud"-A Randomized Controlled Partial Cross-Over Clinical Study.Diabetes Spectr. 2022 Feb 15;35(1):86-94. doi: 10.2337/ds20-0101. Epub 2022 Feb 8. Diabetes Spectr. 2022. PMID: 35308153 Free PMC article.
-
Understanding Health Risk Comprehension: The Role of Math Anxiety, Subjective Numeracy, and Objective Numeracy.Med Decis Making. 2020 Feb;40(2):222-234. doi: 10.1177/0272989X20904725. Epub 2020 Feb 13. Med Decis Making. 2020. PMID: 32052694 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Lag T, Bauger L, Lindberg M, Friborg O. The Role of Numeracy and Intelligence in Health-Risk Estimation and Medical Data Interpretation. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making. 2014;27:95–108.
-
- Golbeck AL, Ahlers-Schmidt CR, Paschal AM, Dismuke SE. A Definition and Operational Framework for Health Numeracy. Am J Prev Med. 2005;29:375–76. - PubMed
-
- Lipkus IM. Numeric, Verbal, and Visual Formats of Conveying Health Risks: Suggested Best Practices and Future Recommendations. Medical Decision Making. 2007;27:696–713. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources