Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 May;25(3):341-54.
doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-051978. Epub 2015 May 6.

Pictorial cigarette pack warnings: a meta-analysis of experimental studies

Affiliations
Review

Pictorial cigarette pack warnings: a meta-analysis of experimental studies

Seth M Noar et al. Tob Control. 2016 May.

Abstract

Objective: To inform international research and policy, we conducted a meta-analysis of the experimental literature on pictorial cigarette pack warnings.

Data sources: We systematically searched 7 computerised databases in April 2013 using several search terms. We also searched reference lists of relevant articles.

Study selection: We included studies that used an experimental protocol to test cigarette pack warnings and reported data on both pictorial and text-only conditions. 37 studies with data on 48 independent samples (N=33,613) met criteria.

Data extraction and synthesis: Two independent coders coded all study characteristics. Effect sizes were computed from data extracted from study reports and were combined using random effects meta-analytic procedures.

Results: Pictorial warnings were more effective than text-only warnings for 12 of 17 effectiveness outcomes (all p<0.05). Relative to text-only warnings, pictorial warnings (1) attracted and held attention better; (2) garnered stronger cognitive and emotional reactions; (3) elicited more negative pack attitudes and negative smoking attitudes and (4) more effectively increased intentions to not start smoking and to quit smoking. Participants also perceived pictorial warnings as being more effective than text-only warnings across all 8 perceived effectiveness outcomes.

Conclusions: The evidence from this international body of literature supports pictorial cigarette pack warnings as more effective than text-only warnings. Gaps in the literature include a lack of assessment of smoking behaviour and a dearth of theory-based research on how warnings exert their effects.

Keywords: Global health; Packaging and Labelling; Public policy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA flow diagram showing the study screening process.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Message impact framework applied to research on cigarette pack warnings.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Forest plot displaying effect sizes and 95% CIs for attention outcomes.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Forest plot displaying effect sizes and 95% CIs for warning reactions.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Forest plot displaying effect sizes and 95% CIs for attitudes/beliefs.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Forest plot displaying effect sizes and 95% CIs for intentions.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Forest plot displaying effect sizes and 95% CIs for perceived effectiveness.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Effects of pictorial warnings on cigarette packs (summary of findings).

References

    1. World Health Organization. WHO report on the global tobacco epidemic, 2013: enforcing bans on tobacco advertising, promotion and sponsorship. Geneva, Switzerland, 2013.
    1. Wakefield M, Morley C, Horan J, et al. The cigarette pack as image: new evidence from tobacco industry documents. Tob Control 2002;11(Suppl 1):I73–80. 10.1136/tc.11.suppl_1.i73 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Moodie C, Hastings G. Tobacco packaging as promotion. Tob Control 2010;19:168–70. 10.1136/tc.2009.033449 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Health warnings on tobacco products—worldwide, 2007. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2009;58:528–9. - PubMed
    1. Durkin S, Brennan E, Wakefield M. Mass media campaigns to promote smoking cessation among adults: an integrative review. Tob Control 2012;21:127–38. 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050345 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types