Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2015 Nov;30(11):1665-72.
doi: 10.1007/s11606-015-3355-x.

A Successful Multifaceted Trial to Improve Hypertension Control in Primary Care: Why Did it Work?

Karen L Margolis  1 , Stephen E Asche  2 , Anna R Bergdall  2 , Steven P Dehmer  2 , Michael V Maciosek  2 , Rachel A Nyboer  2 , Patrick J O'Connor  2 , Pamala A Pawloski  2 , JoAnn M Sperl-Hillen  2 , Nicole K Trower  2 , Ann D Tucker  2 , Beverly B Green  3
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

A Successful Multifaceted Trial to Improve Hypertension Control in Primary Care: Why Did it Work?

Karen L Margolis et al. J Gen Intern Med. 2015 Nov.

Abstract

Background: It is important to understand which components of successful multifaceted interventions are responsible for study outcomes, since some components may be more important contributors to the intervention effect than others.

Objective: We conducted a mediation analysis to determine which of seven factors had the greatest effect on change in systolic blood pressure (BP) after 6 months in a trial to improve hypertension control.

Design: The study was a preplanned secondary analysis of a cluster-randomized clinical trial. Eight clinics in an integrated health system were randomized to provide usual care to their patients (n = 222), and eight were randomized to provide a telemonitoring intervention (n = 228).

Participants: Four hundred three of 450 trial participants completing the 6-month follow-up visit were included.

Interventions: Intervention group participants received home BP telemonitors and transmitted measurements to pharmacists, who adjusted medications and provided advice to improve adherence to medications and lifestyle modification via telephone visits.

Main measures: Path analytic models estimated indirect effects of the seven potential mediators of intervention effect (defined as the difference between the intervention and usual care groups in change in systolic BP from baseline to 6 months). The potential mediators were change in home BP monitor use, number of BP medication classes, adherence to BP medications, physical activity, salt intake, alcohol use, and weight.

Key results: The difference in change in systolic BP was 11.3 mmHg. The multivariable mediation model explained 47 % (5.3 mmHg) of the intervention effect. Nearly all of this was mediated by two factors: an increase in medication treatment intensity (24 %) and increased home BP monitor use (19 %). The other five factors were not significant mediators, although medication adherence and salt intake improved more in the intervention group than in the usual care group.

Conclusions: Most of the explained intervention effect was attributable to the combination of self-monitoring and medication intensification. High adherence at baseline and the relatively low intensity of resources directed toward lifestyle change may explain why these factors did not contribute to the improvement in BP.

Keywords: Blood pressure; Case management; Hypertension; Mediation; Randomized trial; Telemonitoring.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
a Single-mediator model. b Unmediated treatment effect
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Multiple-mediator model
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

References

    1. Go AS, Mozaffarian D, Roger VL, Benjamin EJ, Berry JD, Blaha MJ, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics–2014 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2014;129(3):399–410. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000442015.53336.12. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gillespie CD, Hurvitz KA. Prevalence of hypertension and controlled hypertension - United States, 2007–2010. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2013;62(Suppl 3):144–148. - PubMed
    1. Go AS, Bauman MA, Coleman King SM, Fonarow GC, Lawrence W, Williams KA, et al. An effective approach to high blood pressure control: a science advisory from the American Heart Association, the American College of Cardiology, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63(12):1230–1238. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.11.007. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Frieden TR, King SM, Wright JS. Protocol-based treatment of hypertension: a critical step on the pathway to progress. JAMA. 2014;311(1):21–22. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.282615. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Walsh JM, McDonald KM, Shojania KG, Sundaram V, Nayak S, Lewis R, et al. Quality improvement strategies for hypertension management: a systematic review. Med Care. 2006;44(7):646–657. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000220260.30768.32. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances