Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 May;63(5):853-9.
doi: 10.1111/jgs.13393. Epub 2015 May 6.

Mobility device use in older adults and incidence of falls and worry about falling: findings from the 2011-2012 national health and aging trends study

Affiliations

Mobility device use in older adults and incidence of falls and worry about falling: findings from the 2011-2012 national health and aging trends study

Nancy M Gell et al. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2015 May.

Abstract

Objectives: To examine the prevalence of mobility device use in community-dwelling older adults in the United States and to investigate the incidence of falls and worry about falling according to type and number of mobility devices used.

Design: Analysis of cross-sectional and longitudinal data from the 2011-12 National Health and Aging Trends Study.

Setting: In-person interviews in the homes of study participants.

Participants: Nationally representative sample of Medicare beneficiaries (n=7,609).

Measurements: Participants were asked about mobility device use (e.g., canes, walkers, wheelchairs and scooters) in the last month, 1-year fall history and worry about falling.

Results: Twenty-four percent of adults aged 65 and older reported mobility device use in 2011, and 9.3% reported using multiple devices within the last month. Mobility device use increased with advancing age and was associated with nonwhite race and ethnicity, female sex, lower education level, greater multimorbidity, and obesity (all P<.001). Adjusting for demographic and health characteristics and physical function, the incidence of falls and recurrent falls was not associated with the use of multiple devices or any particular type of mobility device. Activity-limiting worry about falling was significantly higher in cane-only users than in nonusers.

Conclusion: The percentage of older adults reporting mobility device use is higher than results from previous national surveys, and multiple device use is common in those who use any device. Mobility device use is not associated with greater incidence of falls. Cane-only users may compensate for worry about falling by limiting activity.

Keywords: falls; mobility devices; worry about falls.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: The authors declare no financial, personal, or potential conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Prevalence of Mobility Device Use by Age in Men (A) and Women (B) 65 Years and Older, United States: National Health and Aging Trends Study, 2011.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Incidence of Falls and Worry About Falls 12 Months Post Baseline According to the Number of Mobility Devices Used and Fall History at Baseline, United States: National Health and Aging Trends Study, 2011 −2012

References

    1. Gooberman-Hill R, Ebrahim S. Making decisions about simple interventions: Older people's use of walking aids. Age Ageing. 2007;36:569–573. - PubMed
    1. Van der Esch M, Heijmans M, Dekker J. Factors contributing to possession and use of walking aids among persons with rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis. Arthritis Care Res. 2003;49:838–842. - PubMed
    1. LaPlante MP. Assistive technology devices and home accessibility features: Prevalence, payment, need, and trends. Advance data from vital and health statistics. 1992 - PubMed
    1. Kaye HS, Kang T, LaPlante MP. Mobility device use in the united states: National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research, US Department of Education. 2000
    1. Cornman JC, Freedman VA. Racial and ethnic disparities in mobility device use in late life. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2008;63:S34–S41. - PubMed

Publication types