Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 May 5;108(9):2291-9.
doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2015.01.044.

Flanking A·T basepairs destabilize the B(∗) conformation of DNA A-tracts

Affiliations

Flanking A·T basepairs destabilize the B(∗) conformation of DNA A-tracts

Earle Stellwagen et al. Biophys J. .

Abstract

Capillary electrophoresis has been used to characterize the interaction of monovalent cations with 26-basepair DNA oligomers containing A-tracts embedded in flanking sequences with different basepair compositions. A 26-basepair random-sequence oligomer was used as the reference; lithium and tetrabutylammonium (TBA(+)) ions were used as the probe ions. The free solution mobilities of the A-tract and random-sequence oligomers were identical in solutions containing <∼ 100 mM cation. At higher cation concentrations, the A-tract oligomers migrated faster than the reference oligomer in TBA(+) and slower than the reference in Li(+). Hence, cations of different sizes can interact very differently with DNA A-tracts. The increased mobilities observed in TBA(+) suggest that the large hydrophobic TBA(+) ions are preferentially excluded from the vicinity of the A-tract minor groove, increasing the effective net charge of the A-tract oligomers and increasing the mobility. By contrast, Li(+) ions decrease the mobility of A-tract oligomers because of the preferential localization of Li(+) ions in the narrow A-tract minor groove. Embedding the A-tracts in AT-rich flanking sequences markedly alters preferential interactions of monovalent cations with the B(∗) conformation. Hence, A-tracts embedded in genomic DNA may or may not interact preferentially with monovalent cations, depending on the relative number of A · T basepairs in the flanking sequences.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(A) Dependence of the mobility ratios, μ(A-tract)/μ(random), observed for: (•,○), A4T1in(0); (▲,Δ), A4T1in(6); and (♦,⋄), A4T1in(10) as a function of cation concentration in BGEs containing: TBA+ (solid symbols) or Li+ (open symbols). The error bars correspond to the standard deviation of replicate measurements in each BGE. (B) Fractional change of the mobility ratios observed for A4T1in(0) and A4T1in(6) as a function of cation concentration; the transition midpoint occurs at 150 ± 10 mM cation.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Dependence of the mobility ratios observed for oligomer A4T1in(6) on temperature in: (○), 300 mM Li+; and (•), 300 mM TBA+. The midpoints of the thermal transitions are 39 ± 1°C in Li+ and 27 ± 1°C in TBA+.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Dependence of the average mobility differences observed per A-tract, in m.u., on A-tract length. The BGEs contained 300 mM TBA+ (solid symbols); or 300 mM Li+ (open symbols). The error bars represent the standard deviation of the mobility differences from the average; the standard deviations of the individual mobility differences were smaller than the sizes of the symbols. The straight line through the TBA+ data was drawn by linear regression (r2 = 0.985); the Li+ data were fitted to a three-parameter exponential decay (r2 = 0.839).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Mobility differences, in m.u., observed for oligomers A4T1in(0) to A4T1in(11) as a function of the number of flanking A·T basepairs, in BGEs containing: (•), 300 mM TBA+; or (○), 300 mM Li+. Error bars corresponding to the reproducibility of the measurements are smaller than the sizes of the symbols.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Coll M., Frederick C.A., Rich A. A bifurcated hydrogen-bonded conformation in the d(A.T) base pairs of the DNA dodecamer d(CGCAAATTTGCG) and its complex with distamycin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1987;84:8385–8389. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nelson H.C.M., Finch J.T., Klug A. The structure of an oligo(dA).oligo(dT) tract and its biological implications. Nature. 1987;330:221–226. - PubMed
    1. Hagerman P.J. Sequence-directed curvature of DNA. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 1990;59:755–781. - PubMed
    1. Olson W.K., Zhurkin V.B. Twenty years of DNA bending. In: Sarma R.H., Sarma M.H., editors. Biological Structure and Dynamics. Adenine Press; Schenectady, NY: 1996. pp. 341–370.
    1. Haran T.E., Mohanty U. The unique structure of A-tracts and intrinsic DNA bending. Q. Rev. Biophys. 2009;42:41–81. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources