Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 May 8;10(5):e0126258.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0126258. eCollection 2015.

Differences in Lower Extremity and Trunk Kinematics between Single Leg Squat and Step Down Tasks

Affiliations

Differences in Lower Extremity and Trunk Kinematics between Single Leg Squat and Step Down Tasks

Cara L Lewis et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

The single leg squat and single leg step down are two commonly used functional tasks to assess movement patterns. It is unknown how kinematics compare between these tasks. The purpose of this study was to identify kinematic differences in the lower extremity, pelvis and trunk between the single leg squat and the step down. Fourteen healthy individuals participated in this research and performed the functional tasks while kinematic data were collected for the trunk, pelvis, and lower extremities using a motion capture system. For the single leg squat task, the participant was instructed to squat as low as possible. For the step down task, the participant was instructed to stand on top of a box, slowly lower him/herself until the non-stance heel touched the ground, and return to standing. This was done from two different heights (16 cm and 24 cm). The kinematics were evaluated at peak knee flexion as well as at 60° of knee flexion. Pearson correlation coefficients (r) between the angles at those two time points were also calculated to better understand the relationship between each task. The tasks resulted in kinematics differences at the knee, hip, pelvis, and trunk at both time points. The single leg squat was performed with less hip adduction (p ≤ 0.003), but more hip external rotation and knee abduction (p ≤ 0.030), than the step down tasks at 60° of knee flexion. These differences were maintained at peak knee flexion except hip external rotation was only significant in the 24 cm step down task (p ≤ 0.029). While there were multiple differences between the two step heights at peak knee flexion, the only difference at 60° of knee flexion was in trunk flexion (p < 0.001). Angles at the knee and hip had a moderate to excellent correlation (r = 0.51-0.98), but less consistently so at the pelvis and trunk (r = 0.21-0.96). The differences in movement patterns between the single leg squat and the step down should be considered when selecting a single leg task for evaluation or treatment. The high correlation of knee and hip angles between the three tasks indicates that similar information about knee and hip kinematics was gained from each of these tasks, while pelvis and trunk angles were less well predicted.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Representation of the 42 spherical, retro-reflective markers placed bilaterally over landmarks on the lower extremity, pelvis and trunk.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Pictorial representation of a participant performing the single leg squat task (SLS) and step down task from a 16 cm height (SD16) and from a 24 cm height (SD24) at 60° of knee flexion.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Average knee, hip, pelvis and trunk angles from a representative participant performing each of the three tasks.
As the task durations were not equal, data were normalized to maintain the time differences between tasks for presentation purposes only.

References

    1. Teyhen D, Bergeron MF, Deuster P, Baumgartner N, Beutler AI, de la Motte SJ, et al. Consortium for health and military performance and American College of Sports Medicine Summit: Utility of functional movement assessment in identifying musculoskeletal injury risk. Curr Sports Med Rep. 2014;13: 52–63. 10.1249/JSR.0000000000000023 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kivlan BR, Martin RL. Functional performance testing of the hip in athletes: A systematic review for reliability and validity. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2012;7: 402–412. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hollman JH, Galardi CM, Lin IH, Voth BC, Whitmarsh CL. Frontal and transverse plane hip kinematics and gluteus maximus recruitment correlate with frontal plane knee kinematics during single-leg squat tests in women. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2014;29: 468–474. 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2013.12.017 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Crossley KM, Zhang WJ, Schache AG, Bryant A, Cowan SM. Performance on the single-leg squat task indicates hip abductor muscle function. Am J Sports Med. 2011;39: 866–873. 10.1177/0363546510395456 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Willy RW, Manal KT, Witvrouw EE, Davis IS. Are mechanics different between male and female runners with patellofemoral pain? Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012;44: 2165–2171. 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3182629215 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types