Access site complications following transfemoral coronary procedures: comparison between traditional compression and angioseal vascular closure devices for haemostasis
- PMID: 25956814
- PMCID: PMC4434571
- DOI: 10.1186/s12872-015-0022-4
Access site complications following transfemoral coronary procedures: comparison between traditional compression and angioseal vascular closure devices for haemostasis
Abstract
Background: Vascular closure devices such as angioseal are used as alternatives to traditional compression haemostasis. Although the safety and efficacy of angioseal are confirmed, their use remains controversial because of the potential complications of these devices compared with those of traditional compression haemostasis. The aim of this study was to compare the access site complication rate, the predictive factors for these complications, and patient comfort levels after coronary procedures with traditional compression or angioseal haemostasis.
Methods: Data were collected from a cardiac unit in a medical center in northern Taiwan. A total of 130 adult patients were recruited and equally divided into two groups according to the method of haemostasis used after the coronary procedure: a traditional compression group and an angioseal group. We observed the incidence of access site complications, including bleeding, oozing, haematoma formation, and arteriovenous fistula formation. In addition, we used a 0-10 numeric rating scale to assess soreness, numbness, and back and groin access site pain after 1 h of catheter removal and immediately before getting out of bed.
Results: The overall incidence of complications was 3.8 % (n = 5), which was not significantly different between the two groups (p = .06). The propensity score--adjusted multivariate analyses revealed that the only independent predictor for access site complications was an age of >70 years (OR, 10.44; 95 % CI, 1.81-60.06; p = .009). Comfort levels were higher in the angioseal group than in the traditional compression group.
Conclusions: Angioseal used after coronary procedures did not increase the incidence of complications relative to that associated with traditional compression haemostasis; however, it increased patient comfort levels. Health personnel should pay special attention to the predictive factor for access site complications after coronary procedures, such as age >70 years.
Similar articles
-
The use of the Angioseal device for femoral artery closure.J Vasc Surg. 2004 Aug;40(2):287-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2004.05.007. J Vasc Surg. 2004. PMID: 15297822
-
Angioseal VIP® vs. StarClose SE® closure devices: a comparative analysis in non-cardiological procedures.J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2017 Feb;58(1):80-86. doi: 10.23736/S0021-9509.16.07654-0. Epub 2013 Dec 5. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2017. PMID: 24309473
-
Rationale and design of a randomised clinical trial comparing vascular closure device and manual compression to achieve haemostasis after diagnostic coronary angiography: the Instrumental Sealing of ARterial puncture site - CLOSURE device versus manual compression (ISAR-CLOSURE) trial.EuroIntervention. 2014 Jun;10(2):198-203. doi: 10.4244/EIJV10I2A33. EuroIntervention. 2014. PMID: 24952057 Clinical Trial.
-
Arterial access and arteriotomy site closure devices.Nat Rev Cardiol. 2016 Nov;13(11):641-650. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2016.133. Epub 2016 Aug 25. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2016. PMID: 27558003 Review.
-
Vascular complications associated with arteriotomy closure devices in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary procedures: a meta-analysis.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004 Sep 15;44(6):1200-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.06.048. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004. PMID: 15364320 Review.
Cited by
-
Acute lower limb ischemia following Angio-Seal deployment after transfemoral percutaneous coronary intervention.Kardiochir Torakochirurgia Pol. 2019 Jul;16(2):103-105. doi: 10.5114/kitp.2019.86365. Epub 2019 Jun 28. Kardiochir Torakochirurgia Pol. 2019. PMID: 31410100 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Music to relieve pain and anxiety in cardiac catheterization: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Heliyon. 2024 Jun 28;10(13):e33815. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33815. eCollection 2024 Jul 15. Heliyon. 2024. PMID: 39044980 Free PMC article.
-
Avoiding peripheral nerve injury in arterial interventions.Diagn Interv Radiol. 2019 Sep;25(5):380-391. doi: 10.5152/dir.2019.18296. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2019. PMID: 31310240 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Incidence and predictors of groin complications early after coronary artery intervention: a prospective observational study.BMC Nurs. 2019 Jun 28;18:24. doi: 10.1186/s12912-019-0349-8. eCollection 2019. BMC Nurs. 2019. PMID: 31297032 Free PMC article.
-
Femoral Access-Site Complications with Tenecteplase versus Alteplase before Mechanical Thrombectomy for Large-Vessel-Occlusion Stroke.AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2023 Jun;44(6):681-686. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A7862. Epub 2023 May 11. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2023. PMID: 37169538 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Piper WD, Malenka DJ, Ryan TJ, Shubrooks SJ, O’Connor GT, Robb JF, Farrell KL, Corliss MS, Hearne MJ, Kellett MA, Watloms MW, Bradley WA, Hettleman BD, Silver TM, McGrath PD, O’Mears JR, Wennberg DE, Northern New England Cardivascular Disease Study Group Predicting vascular complications in percutaneous coronary interventions. Am Heart J. 2003;145(6):1022–9. doi: 10.1016/S0002-8703(03)00079-6. - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical