[Stem cell transplantation for multiple sclerosis. Hamburg experiences and state of international research]
- PMID: 25956824
- DOI: 10.1007/s00115-015-4305-x
[Stem cell transplantation for multiple sclerosis. Hamburg experiences and state of international research]
Abstract
Background: Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (aHSCT) is still not the standard treatment for highly inflammatory multiple sclerosis (MS). Even though randomized controlled trials are lacking, predictors for treatment response have been established. Since 2007, ten patients have received aHSCT in Hamburg.
Objective: To present observational data from patients treated in Hamburg and a review of the literature.
Methods: Descriptive statistics were used for evaluating the course of the expanded disability status scale (EDSS) as a measure for clinical outcome, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and neuropsychology. New gadolinium and T2-MRI uptake lesions per scan were compared. In addition, a systematic review of the currently available literature was performed.
Results: The Hamburg series can be divided in two groups, one group including four patients with chronic progressive MS with low inflammatory activity (median EDSS = 6.25, 0.5 relapses per year, no gadolinium-enhancing lesions) and the other group including six patients with mild to moderate disability, relapses and inflammatory activity (median EDSS = 4.25, 1 relapse per year, 2 gadolinium-enhancing lesions). The median follow-up was 2.4 years. While the first group did not seem to benefit from aHSCT, an improvement in five out of six patients was observed in the second group. New T2 lesions occurred within the first 6 months but gadolinium-enhancing lesions were not observed (p < 0.05). A systematic literature search identified a higher efficacy of aHSCT in younger, less disabled MS patients with inflammatory activity, similar to the findings from Hamburg.
Conclusion: Cohort reports describe aHSCT as a safe and efficient treatment option in highly inflammatory MS. Based on these data aHSCT seems to be a reasonable option in selected patients with highly inflammatory MS but a randomized controlled trial is warranted.
Similar articles
-
Immunoablation and autologous haemopoietic stem-cell transplantation for aggressive multiple sclerosis: a multicentre single-group phase 2 trial.Lancet. 2016 Aug 6;388(10044):576-85. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30169-6. Epub 2016 Jun 9. Lancet. 2016. PMID: 27291994 Clinical Trial.
-
Long-term outcomes of autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation with reduced-intensity conditioning in multiple sclerosis: physician's and patient's perspectives.Ann Hematol. 2015 Jul;94(7):1149-57. doi: 10.1007/s00277-015-2337-8. Epub 2015 Feb 25. Ann Hematol. 2015. PMID: 25711670
-
aHSCT is superior to alemtuzumab in maintaining NEDA and improving cognition in multiple sclerosis.Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2021 Jun;8(6):1269-1278. doi: 10.1002/acn3.51366. Epub 2021 May 5. Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2021. PMID: 33949790 Free PMC article.
-
[Multiple sclerosis: interventions to halt disease : Which patients can be considered for autologous stem cell transplantation].Nervenarzt. 2022 Oct;93(10):987-999. doi: 10.1007/s00115-022-01358-3. Epub 2022 Aug 11. Nervenarzt. 2022. PMID: 35951049 Review. German.
-
Management of worsening multiple sclerosis with mitoxantrone: a review.Clin Ther. 2006 Apr;28(4):461-74. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2006.04.013. Clin Ther. 2006. PMID: 16750460 Review.
Cited by
-
Self-reported changes in the expanded disability status scale score in patients with multiple sclerosis after autologous stem cell transplants: real-world data from a single center.Clin Exp Immunol. 2019 Dec;198(3):351-358. doi: 10.1111/cei.13358. Epub 2019 Aug 19. Clin Exp Immunol. 2019. PMID: 31394007 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical