Water Exchange Is the Least Painful Colonoscope Insertion Technique and Increases Completion of Unsedated Colonoscopy
- PMID: 25956838
- DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2015.04.178
Water Exchange Is the Least Painful Colonoscope Insertion Technique and Increases Completion of Unsedated Colonoscopy
Abstract
Background & aims: Unsedated colonoscopy is acceptable for diagnostic, surveillance, and screening indications worldwide. However, insertion of the colonoscope can be painful; it is not clear which technique is least painful and thereby increases the likelihood of colonoscopy completion. We performed a head-to-head comparison of air insufflation (AI), carbon dioxide (CO2) insufflation, water immersion (WI), and water exchange (WE) to determine which combination of insertion techniques produces the least amount of pain.
Methods: In a patient-blinded prospective trial, 624 subjects were assigned randomly to groups that underwent colonoscopy with AI-AI, CO2-CO2, WI-AI, WE-AI, WI-CO2, or WE-CO2 insertion and withdrawal techniques, including on-demand sedation, at the St. Barbara Hospital (Iglesias, Italy) or the Vìtkovice Hospital (Ostrava, Czech Republic), from October 2013 through June 2014. The primary outcome was real-time maximum insertion pain (0 = none, 10 = worst), recorded by an unblinded nurse assistant. At discharge, a blinded observer recorded the recalled maximum insertion pain and patients' and investigators' guesses about method or gas used.
Results: Patients and investigators correctly guessed the method used for fewer than 44% of procedures, confirming adequate blinding. The correlation between real-time and recalled maximum insertion pain (r = 0.9; P < .0005) confirmed internal validation of the primary outcome. The WE group had the lowest scores: mean pain values were 5.2 for AI-AI (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.6-5.8), 4.9 for CO2-CO2 (95% CI, 4.3-5.4), 4.3 for WI-CO2 (95% CI, 3.8-4.9), 4.0 for WI-AI (95% CI, 3.5-4.5), 3.1 for WE-CO2 (95% CI, 2.7-3.4), and 3.1 for WE-AI (95% CI, 2.7-3.6) (P < .0005). The highest proportions of patients completing unsedated colonoscopy were in the WE groups. WE groups also had significantly better colon cleanliness, particularly in the transverse and right colon (P < .0005). One limitation of the study was that colonoscopists and assistants were not blinded to water-aided insertion methods.
Conclusions: In a prospective study of colonoscopy insertion methods, CO2 insufflation did not reduce real-time maximum insertion pain. Compared with AI or CO2, WI and WE reduced insertion pain. The least painful technique was WE, which significantly increased completion of unsedated colonoscopy and bowel cleanliness without prolonging insertion time. ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT01954862.
Keywords: Bowel Preparation; Discomfort; Medication-Free Colonoscopy; Pain.
Copyright © 2015 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Water Filling and Carbon Dioxide Insufflation: Tools for Every Colonoscopist.Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 Nov;13(11):1981-3. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2015.07.046. Epub 2015 Aug 6. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015. PMID: 26254989 No abstract available.
-
Some Clarifications About Water-Aided Colonoscopy.Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Feb;14(2):323. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2015.09.003. Epub 2015 Sep 12. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016. PMID: 26375611 No abstract available.
-
Reply.Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Feb;14(2):323-4. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2015.09.022. Epub 2015 Oct 17. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016. PMID: 26432477 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical