The application of S.T.O.N.E. nephrolithometry in pediatric patients with upper urinary tract calculi treated with mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy
- PMID: 25958052
- DOI: 10.1007/s00240-015-0772-6
The application of S.T.O.N.E. nephrolithometry in pediatric patients with upper urinary tract calculi treated with mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to verify the applicability of S.T.O.N.E. nephrolithometry in pediatric patients. 103 cases of pediatric patients younger than 4 years old with upper urinary tract calculi treated with mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy from January 2012 to March 2014 were retrospectively reviewed and evaluated using this scoring system. All procedures were performed under general anesthesia, using a 14-French nephroscope through a 16-French working access. All patients were divided into two groups according to the stages of the operations, Group A for one-stage operation and Group B for two-stage operation. 87 cases were male and 16 cases were female with the mean age of 26.5 months. The total operation time of group A was 45.89±5.43 min, and 54.62±5.58 min of group B (p=0.000). The hospitalization for group A and group B was 6.63±1.34 and 7.23±1.24 days, respectively (p=0.134). The total S.T.O.N.E. score was 5.93±0.67 for Group A, and 7.92±1.04 for Group B (p=0.000). On further dividing each group into low/moderate/high complexity according to the total score, more cases of low/moderate complexity in group A and more cases of moderate/high complexity in group B (χ2=38.096, p=0.000) were reported. Our data suggest that S.T.O.N.E. nephrolithometry is applicable in pediatric upper urinary tract calculi assessment and predictive for the complexity of the operation, hospitalization, and even complications after the operation. Yet modification may be necessary to make this scoring system more distinguishable for pediatric cases.
Similar articles
-
Do the urolithiasis scoring systems predict the success of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in cases with anatomical abnormalities?Urolithiasis. 2017 Jun;45(3):305-310. doi: 10.1007/s00240-016-0903-8. Epub 2016 Jul 12. Urolithiasis. 2017. PMID: 27406306
-
[Evaluation and Comparison of SHA.LIN,S.T.O.N.E.Nephrolithometry Scoring System,and Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society Nephrolithometry Nomogram for Predicting Stone Free Rate and Postoperative Outcomes after Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy].Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao. 2019 Aug 30;41(4):492-500. doi: 10.3881/j.issn.1000-503X.10767. Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao. 2019. PMID: 31484611 Chinese.
-
Evaluation and comparison of urolithiasis scoring systems used in percutaneous kidney stone surgery.J Urol. 2015 Jan;193(1):154-9. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.07.104. Epub 2014 Aug 1. J Urol. 2015. PMID: 25088952
-
Predictors of fluoroscopy time during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: impact of postgraduate urology trainees and S.T.O.N.E. nephrolithometry score.J Endourol. 2015 May;29(5):542-7. doi: 10.1089/end.2014.0800. Epub 2015 Feb 25. J Endourol. 2015. PMID: 25594830
-
Laparoscopic pyelolithotomy compared to percutaneous nephrolithotomy as surgical management for large renal pelvic calculi: a meta-analysis.J Urol. 2013 Sep;190(3):888-93. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.02.092. Epub 2013 Feb 27. J Urol. 2013. PMID: 23454154 Review.
Cited by
-
Predictability and Practicality of Image-Based Scoring Systems for Patient Assessment and Outcome Stratification During Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: a Contemporary Update.Curr Urol Rep. 2017 Oct 18;18(12):95. doi: 10.1007/s11934-017-0740-5. Curr Urol Rep. 2017. PMID: 29046986 Review.
-
Nephrolithometric Scoring Systems to Predict Outcomes of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy.Rev Urol. 2016;18(1):15-27. Rev Urol. 2016. PMID: 27162508 Free PMC article.
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources