Diagnostic yield of routine noninvasive cardiovascular testing in low-risk acute chest pain patients
- PMID: 25958114
- PMCID: PMC5111079
- DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.03.058
Diagnostic yield of routine noninvasive cardiovascular testing in low-risk acute chest pain patients
Abstract
Contemporary professional society recommendations for patients presenting to the emergency department with acute chest pain and low clinical risk encourage noninvasive testing for coronary artery disease (CAD) before, or shortly after, discharge from the emergency department. Recent reports indicate that a strategy of universal testing has a low diagnostic yield and may not be necessary. We examined data from a prospective cohort of patients who underwent evaluation of acute chest pain in our chest pain evaluation center (CPEC). Patients presenting with normal initial electrocardiogram and cardiac injury markers were eligible for observation and noninvasive testing for CAD in our CPEC. All patients were asked to participate in the prospective registry. The 213 subjects who consented were young, obese, and predominantly women (mean age 43.8 ± 12.5, mean body mass index of 30.8 ± 7, 64.8% women). Prevalence of diabetes was 10.3% (hypertension 37.1%, hyperlipidemia 17.8%, and current tobacco use 23.5%) Exercise treadmill testing was the primary method of evaluation (n = 104, 49%) followed by computed tomography coronary angiography (n = 58, 27%) and myocardial perfusion imaging (n = 20, 9%). Of 203 patients who underwent testing, 11 had abnormal test results, 4 of whom had obstructive CAD based on invasive coronary angiography. The positive predictive value for obstructive CAD after an abnormal test was 45.5%, and the overall diagnostic yield for obstructive CAD was 2.5%. In conclusion, in patients with acute chest pain evaluated in a CPEC, the yield of routine use of noninvasive testing for CAD was minimal and the positive predictive value of an abnormal test was low.
Published by Elsevier Inc.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Rest-Only Myocardial CT Perfusion in Acute Chest Pain.South Med J. 2015 Nov;108(11):688-94. doi: 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000000372. South Med J. 2015. PMID: 26539951
-
Utility of the Diamond-Forrester Classification in Stratifying Acute Chest Pain in an Academic Chest Pain Center.Crit Pathw Cardiol. 2016 Jun;15(2):56-9. doi: 10.1097/HPC.0000000000000071. Crit Pathw Cardiol. 2016. PMID: 27183255 Free PMC article.
-
The Significance of Equivocal Exercise Treadmill ECG for Intermediate Risk Chest Pain Assessment - Insight From Coronary CT Angiography Data.Heart Lung Circ. 2018 Jan;27(1):50-57. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2017.01.015. Epub 2017 Mar 1. Heart Lung Circ. 2018. PMID: 28320636
-
[Is a more efficient operative strategy feasible for the emergency management of the patient with acute chest pain?].Ital Heart J Suppl. 2000 Feb;1(2):186-201. Ital Heart J Suppl. 2000. PMID: 10731376 Review. Italian.
-
ACR Appropriateness Criteria Acute Nonspecific Chest Pain-Low Probability of Coronary Artery Disease.J Am Coll Radiol. 2015 Dec;12(12 Pt A):1266-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2015.09.004. J Am Coll Radiol. 2015. PMID: 26653833 Review.
Cited by
-
Limited Use of Outpatient Stress Testing in Young Patients With Atypical Chest Pain.Fed Pract. 2018 Nov;35(Suppl 6):S30-S34. Fed Pract. 2018. PMID: 30766410 Free PMC article.
-
Incidence and predictors of acute coronary syndrome within a year following a negative stress test-a false sense of security: is routine screening any useful?Ann Transl Med. 2018 Jan;6(1):13. doi: 10.21037/atm.2017.11.12. Ann Transl Med. 2018. PMID: 29404359 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Angina treatments and prevention of cardiac events: an appraisal of the evidence.Eur Heart J Suppl. 2015 Dec;17(Suppl G):G10-G18. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/suv054. Epub 2015 Dec 16. Eur Heart J Suppl. 2015. PMID: 26740801 Free PMC article.
-
Implementation of a High-sensitivity Troponin Assay for Adult Patients Who Present to the Emergency Department With Chest Pain: The Role of Clinical Decision Support.CJC Open. 2024 Sep 29;6(12):1491-1500. doi: 10.1016/j.cjco.2024.09.010. eCollection 2024 Dec. CJC Open. 2024. PMID: 39735952 Free PMC article.
-
Coronary calcium scoring as first-line test to detect and exclude coronary artery disease in patients presenting to the general practitioner with stable chest pain: protocol of the cluster-randomised CONCRETE trial.BMJ Open. 2022 Apr 19;12(4):e055123. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055123. BMJ Open. 2022. PMID: 35440450 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Diamond GA, Forrester JS. Analysis of probability as an aid in the clinical diagnosis of coronary-artery disease. N Engl J Med. 1979;300:1350–1358. - PubMed
-
- Mark DB, Hlatky MA, Harrell FE, Lee KL, Califf RM, Pryor DB. Exercise treadmill score for predicting prognosis in coronary artery disease. Ann Intern Med. 1987;106:793–800. - PubMed
-
- Amsterdam EA, Kirk JD, Diercks DB, Lewis WR, Turnipseed SD. Immediate exercise testing to evaluate low-risk patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;40:251–256. - PubMed
-
- Khare RK, Powell ES, Venkatesh AK, Courtney DM. Diagnostic uncertainty and costs associated with current emergency department evaluation of low risk chest pain. Crit Pathw Cardiol. 2008;7:191–196. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous