Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Apr;10(1):15-24.
doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2015.48573. Epub 2015 Jan 27.

Assessment of the efficacy and safety of steam vein sclerosis as compared to classic surgery in lower extremity varicose vein management

Witold Woźniak  1 , Robert K Mlosek  2 , Piotr Ciostek  1
Affiliations

Assessment of the efficacy and safety of steam vein sclerosis as compared to classic surgery in lower extremity varicose vein management

Witold Woźniak et al. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2015 Apr.

Abstract

Introduction: For the last 10 years, endovenous thermal ablation methods have gradually predominated over the classic Babcock procedure in varicose vein treatment. Steam vein sclerosis is the newest thermal ablation technique.

Aim: To assess the efficacy and safety of steam vein sclerosis as compared to the Babcock procedure in lower extremity varicose vein treatment.

Material and methods: One hundred and two adult subjects with varicose veins of clinical grade C2 to C6 according to the CEAP classification, treated with varicose vein surgery between 2010 and 2012, were enrolled in the study. These were subdivided into two groups: the study group of 52 patients treated with endovenous steam vein sclerosis and the control group of 50 patients treated with the Babcock procedure. A single lower extremity with isolated great or small saphenous vein insufficiency was operated on in each subject. The groups were compared for demography, disease severity, involved veins, potential perioperative and postoperative complications, as well as treatment efficacy based on the VCSS score reduction.

Results: There were no statistically significant differences between the groups in terms of demography, disease severity, involved veins, or perioperative and postoperative complications. The treatment efficacy of both methods, assessed based on the recurrence rate and the quantitative VCSS score reduction, was similar. Clinically significant recanalisation was observed in 1 (1.9%) patient in the study group.

Conclusions: The efficacy and safety analysis shows that steam vein sclerosis is a safe, simple method which can be recommended as effective varicose vein treatment.

Keywords: chronic venous insufficiency; endovenous; percutaneous ablation; steam; varicose veins.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Photo 1
Photo 1
SVS generator
Photo 2
Photo 2
Dental compressor
Photo 3
Photo 3
Assembled vein cannulation set (cannula and SVS catheter)
Photo 4
Photo 4
Roller pump and the infusion set for tumescent fluid administration
Figure 1
Figure 1
Distribution of patients in both groups according to disease severity assessed using clinical grade of CEAP classification, expressed as %
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Winterborn RJ, Corbett CR. Treatment of varicose veins: the present and the future – a questionnaire survey. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2008;90:561–4. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Perrin M, Guidicelli H, Rastel D. Surgical techniques used for the treatment of varicose veins: survey of practice in France. J Mal Vasc. 2003;28:277–86. - PubMed
    1. Perkins JM. Standard varicose vein surgery. Phlebology. 2009;24:34–41. - PubMed
    1. Wood JJ, Chant H, Laugharne M, et al. A prospective study of cutaneous nerve injury following long saphenous vein surgery. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2005;30:654–8. - PubMed
    1. Miller GV, Lewis WG, Sainsbury JR, et al. Morbidity of varicose vein surgery: auditing the benefit of changing clinical practice. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1996;78:345–9. - PMC - PubMed