Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Mar 1;2(1):29-32.
doi: 10.1002/mdc3.12102.

Diagnostic performance of the "Huffing and Puffing" sign in psychogenic (functional) movement disorders

Affiliations

Diagnostic performance of the "Huffing and Puffing" sign in psychogenic (functional) movement disorders

Holly N Laub et al. Mov Disord Clin Pract. .

Abstract

Objective: To determine the diagnostic value of effort-associated behaviors ("huffing and puffing" spectrum) in patients with psychogenic movement disorders.

Methods: Three blinded clinicians rated presence, severity, and duration of effort-associated features during standing and walking tasks on edited videos of 131 patients with psychogenic gait disorders and 37 patients with organic gait disorders.

Results: Huffing, grunting, grimacing, and breath holding were the most common effort-associated behaviors in patients with psychogenic gait disorders, with a combined prevalence of 44% and disproportionate to the severity of gait impairment compared to organic gait disorders. The presence of "huffing and puffing"-type behaviors yielded a relatively low sensitivity but high specificity for the diagnosis of psychogenic movement disorders, increasing the odds of diagnosis 13-fold (95%, CI: 4.2-43.8) compared to organic gait disorders.

Conclusions: Demonstration of effort-associated behaviors during standing and walking strongly supports the psychogenic nature of disorders when gait is involved.

Keywords: excessive effort; psychogenic movement disorders.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Prevalence of H‐P in the PMD and organic cohorts. Five criteria for positivity were used, from least to most stringent: (A) at least mild H‐P by any one rater; (B) at least mild H‐P by any two raters; (C) at least mild H‐P by all three raters; (D) moderate H‐P by any rater; and (E) severe H‐P by any rater. The “combined” bar represents the overall H‐P prevalence without prespecified definitions. Note that mild H‐P was present in controls only by definitions A and D.

References

    1. Morgante F, Edwards MJ, Espay AJ, et al. Diagnostic agreement in patients with psychogenic movement disorders. Mov Disord 2012;27:548–552. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Espay AJ, Goldenhar LM, Voon V, Schrag A, Burton N, Lang AE. Opinions and clinical practices related to diagnosing and managing patients with psychogenic movement disorders: an international survey of movement disorder society members. Mov Disord 2009;24:1366–1374. - PubMed
    1. Morgante F, Edwards MJ, Espay AJ. Psychogenic movement disorders. Continuum (Minneap Minn). Mov Disord 2013;19:1383–1396. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fahn S, Elton RL; Committee atUD . Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale In: Fahn S, Marsden CD, Calne DB, Goldstein M, eds. Recent Developments in Parkinson's Disease. Florham Park, NJ: Macmillan Health Care Information, 1987:153–164.
    1. Thomas M, Jankovic J, Suteerawattananon M, et al. Clinical gait and balance scale (GABS): validation and utilization. J Neurol Sci 2004;217:89–99. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources