SWOG S0809: A Phase II Intergroup Trial of Adjuvant Capecitabine and Gemcitabine Followed by Radiotherapy and Concurrent Capecitabine in Extrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Carcinoma
- PMID: 25964250
- PMCID: PMC4534524
- DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2014.60.2219
SWOG S0809: A Phase II Intergroup Trial of Adjuvant Capecitabine and Gemcitabine Followed by Radiotherapy and Concurrent Capecitabine in Extrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Carcinoma
Abstract
Purpose: The role of postoperative therapy in extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (EHCC) or gallbladder carcinoma (GBCA) is unknown. S0809 was designed to estimate 2-year survival (overall and after R0 or R1 resection), pattern of relapse, and toxicity in patients treated with this adjuvant regimen.
Patients and methods: Eligibility criteria included diagnosis of EHCC or GBCA after radical resection, stage pT2-4 or N+ or positive resection margins, M0, and performance status 0 to 1. Patients received four cycles of gemcitabine (1,000 mg/m(2) intravenously on days 1 and 8) and capecitabine (1,500 mg/m(2) per day on days 1 to 14) every 21 days followed by concurrent capecitabine (1,330 mg/m(2) per day) and radiotherapy (45 Gy to regional lymphatics; 54 to 59.4 Gy to tumor bed). With 80 evaluable patients, results would be promising if 2-year survival 95% CI were > 45% and R0 and R1 survival estimates were ≥ 65% and 45%, respectively.
Results: A total of 79 eligible patients (R0, n = 54; R1, n = 25; EHCC, 68%; GBCA, 32%) were treated (86% completed). For all patients, 2-year survival was 65% (95% CI, 53% to 74%); it was 67% and 60% in R0 and R1 patients, respectively. Median overall survival was 35 months (R0, 34 months; R1, 35 months). Local, distant, and combined relapse occurred in 14, 24, and nine patients. Grade 3 and 4 adverse effects were observed in 52% and 11% of patients, respectively. The most common grade 3 to 4 adverse effects were neutropenia (44%), hand-foot syndrome (11%), diarrhea (8%), lymphopenia (8%), and leukopenia (6%). There was one death resulting from GI hemorrhage.
Conclusion: This combination was well tolerated, has promising efficacy, and provides clinicians with a well-supported regimen. Our trial establishes the feasibility of conducting national adjuvant trials in EHCC and GBCA and provides baseline data for planning future phase III trials.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00789958.
© 2014 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.
Conflict of interest statement
Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest are found in the article online at
Figures



Comment in
-
Biliary Tract Cancers: Finding Better Ways to Lump and Split.J Clin Oncol. 2015 Aug 20;33(24):2588-90. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.61.6953. Epub 2015 Jul 20. J Clin Oncol. 2015. PMID: 26195717 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
A phase II trial of gemcitabine and capecitabine in patients with unresectable or metastatic gallbladder cancer or cholangiocarcinoma: Southwest Oncology Group study S0202.Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2011 Dec;68(6):1595-602. doi: 10.1007/s00280-011-1657-1. Epub 2011 May 10. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2011. PMID: 21556747 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Radiochemotherapy followed by gemcitabine and capecitabine in extrahepatic bile duct cancer: a phase I/II trial.Am J Clin Oncol. 2006 Dec;29(6):576-82. doi: 10.1097/01.coc.0000239167.17922.82. Am J Clin Oncol. 2006. PMID: 17148994 Clinical Trial.
-
A phase II study of gemcitabine and capecitabine in advanced cholangiocarcinoma and carcinoma of the gallbladder: a single-institution prospective study.Ann Surg Oncol. 2007 Nov;14(11):3202-9. doi: 10.1245/s10434-007-9539-9. Epub 2007 Aug 19. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007. PMID: 17705089 Clinical Trial.
-
A meta-analysis of the efficacy of postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy versus no radiotherapy for extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and gallbladder carcinoma.Radiat Oncol. 2020 Jan 15;15(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s13014-020-1459-x. Radiat Oncol. 2020. PMID: 31941520 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The role of capecitabine in the management of tumors of the digestive system.Rev Recent Clin Trials. 2009 Jan;4(1):1-11. doi: 10.2174/157488709787047576. Rev Recent Clin Trials. 2009. PMID: 19149758 Review.
Cited by
-
The Implications of Treatment Delays in Adjuvant Therapy for Resected Cholangiocarcinoma Patients.J Gastrointest Cancer. 2023 Jun;54(2):492-500. doi: 10.1007/s12029-022-00820-4. Epub 2022 Apr 20. J Gastrointest Cancer. 2023. PMID: 35445343 Free PMC article.
-
Benefit of Adjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Resected Gallbladder Carcinoma.Sci Rep. 2019 Aug 13;9(1):11770. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-48099-z. Sci Rep. 2019. PMID: 31409811 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of Positive Radial Margin on Recurrence and Survival in Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma.Cancers (Basel). 2022 Mar 25;14(7):1680. doi: 10.3390/cancers14071680. Cancers (Basel). 2022. PMID: 35406452 Free PMC article.
-
Dose escalation of radiotherapy in unresectable extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.Cancer Med. 2018 Oct;7(10):4880-4892. doi: 10.1002/cam4.1734. Epub 2018 Aug 27. Cancer Med. 2018. PMID: 30152073 Free PMC article.
-
Molecular profiling of biliary cancers reveals distinct molecular alterations and potential therapeutic targets.J Gastrointest Oncol. 2019 Aug;10(4):652-662. doi: 10.21037/jgo.2018.08.18. J Gastrointest Oncol. 2019. PMID: 31392046 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Siegel R, Ma J, Zou Z, et al. Cancer statistics, 2014. CA Cancer J Clin. 2014;64:9–29. - PubMed
-
- Balachandran P, Agarwal S, Krishnani N, et al. Predictors of long-term survival in patients with gallbladder cancer. J Gastrointest Surg. 2006;10:848–854. - PubMed
-
- Ben-David MA, Griffith KA, Abu-Isa E, et al. External-beam radiotherapy for localized extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006;66:772–779. - PubMed
-
- Czito BG, Hurwitz HI, Clough RW, et al. Adjuvant external-beam radiotherapy with concurrent chemotherapy after resection of primary gallbladder carcinoma: A 23-year experience. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005;62:1030–1034. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
Grants and funding
- CA189848/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- U10 CA180835/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- CA180835/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- U10 CA180801/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- CA189953/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- CA180846/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- CA180801/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- U10 CA180790/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- CA180834/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- U10 CA180888/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- U10 CA180834/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- CA189858/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- UG1 CA189848/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- CA189957/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- U10 CA180846/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- UG1 CA180830/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- UG1 CA189858/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- CA180830/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- UG1 CA232760/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- UG1 CA189808/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- CA180888/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- UG1 CA189957/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- CA180819/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- U10 CA180819/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- UG1 CA189953/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- CA189808/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- U10 CA180830/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical