Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Jun 2;112(22):6931-6.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1415181112. Epub 2015 May 11.

Effect of warming temperatures on US wheat yields

Affiliations

Effect of warming temperatures on US wheat yields

Jesse Tack et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. .

Abstract

Climate change is expected to increase future temperatures, potentially resulting in reduced crop production in many key production regions. Research quantifying the complex relationship between weather variables and wheat yields is rapidly growing, and recent advances have used a variety of model specifications that differ in how temperature data are included in the statistical yield equation. A unique data set that combines Kansas wheat variety field trial outcomes for 1985-2013 with location-specific weather data is used to analyze the effect of weather on wheat yield using regression analysis. Our results indicate that the effect of temperature exposure varies across the September-May growing season. The largest drivers of yield loss are freezing temperatures in the Fall and extreme heat events in the Spring. We also find that the overall effect of warming on yields is negative, even after accounting for the benefits of reduced exposure to freezing temperatures. Our analysis indicates that there exists a tradeoff between average (mean) yield and ability to resist extreme heat across varieties. More-recently released varieties are less able to resist heat than older lines. Our results also indicate that warming effects would be partially offset by increased rainfall in the Spring. Finally, we find that the method used to construct measures of temperature exposure matters for both the predictive performance of the regression model and the forecasted warming impacts on yields.

Keywords: agriculture; climate change; global warming; wheat; yield.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Impacts of freezing and degree day temperature variables on wheat yield for the preferred model (SI Appendix, Table S4, column 3), expressed per 24 h (days). Dx,y refers to the degree day variables created from the IDD variables for the thresholds x and y. Each four-bar cluster shows impacts for the Fall, Winter, and Spring months. Bars show 95% confidence intervals using SEs clustered by year and variety.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Predicted warming impacts on wheat yields under alternative uniform temperature changes across the entire Fall−Winter−Spring growing season. Impacts are reported as the percentage change in yield relative to historical climate. Each two-bar cluster shows estimates for a given scenario across different regression model specifications. The preferred model (SI Appendix, Table S4, column 3) estimates the warming effects using all temperature variables, whereas the alternative holds all effects from the Freeze Days variables at zero. Bars show 95% confidence intervals using SEs clustered by year and variety.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Predicted warming impacts on wheat yields under alternative uniform temperature changes across subsets of the growing season. Each four-bar cluster shows estimates from the preferred model accompanied by alternatives that restrict subsets of these effects to be zero. Just Fall ignores temperature effects in the Winter and Spring. Just Winter ignores temperature effects in the Fall and Spring. Just Spring ignores temperature effects in the Fall and Winter. Bars show 95% confidence intervals using SEs clustered by year and variety.

References

    1. Burke MB, Miguel E, Satyanath S, Dykema JA, Lobell DB. Warming increases the risk of civil war in Africa. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106(49):20670–20674. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hsiang SM, Burke M. Climate, conflict, and social stability: What does the evidence say? Clim Change. 2014;123(1):39–55.
    1. Hsiang SM, Burke M, Miguel E. Quantifying the influence of climate on human conflict. Science. 2013;341(6151):1235367. - PubMed
    1. O’Loughlin J, et al. Climate variability and conflict risk in East Africa, 1990−2009. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012;109(45):18344–18349. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Scheffran J, Brzoska M, Kominek J, Link PM, Schilling J. Climate change and violent conflict. Science. 2012;336(6083):869–871. - PubMed

Publication types