Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 May;20(5):50502.
doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.20.5.050502.

Targeted imaging of cancer by fluorocoxib C, a near-infrared cyclooxygenase-2 probe

Targeted imaging of cancer by fluorocoxib C, a near-infrared cyclooxygenase-2 probe

Md Jashim Uddin et al. J Biomed Opt. 2015 May.

Abstract

Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) is a promising target for the imaging of cancer in a range of diagnostic and therapeutic settings. We report a near-infrared COX-2-targeted probe, fluorocoxib C (FC), for visualization of solid tumors by optical imaging. FC exhibits selective and potent COX-2 inhibition in both purified protein and human cancercell lines. In vivo optical imaging shows selective accumulation of FC in COX-2-overexpressing human tumor xenografts [1483 head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC)] implanted in nude mice, while minimal uptake is detectable in COX-2-negative tumor xenografts (HCT116)or 1483 HNSCC xenografts preblocked with the COX-2-selective inhibitor celecoxib. Time course imaging studies conducted from 3 h to 7-day post-FC injection revealed a marked reduction in nonspecific fluorescent signals with retention of fluorescence in 1483 HNSCC tumors. Thus, use of FC in a delayed imaging protocol offers an approach to improve imaging signal-to-noise that should improve cancer detection in multiple preclinical and clinical settings.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Structures of (a) indomethacin, (b) celecoxib (Cel), (c) NIR664 (NIR), and (d) fluorocoxib A (FA).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
(a) Structure of fluorocoxib C (FC). (b) Steady state fluorescence excitation and emission spectra were determined for FC in water pH 7 using a Spex 1681 Fluorolog spectrofluorometer, equipped with a 450 W xenon arc lamp. The excitation and emission monochromator slit widths were 1 to 2 mm. FC exhibited excitation and emission maxima of λex=672  nm and λem=692  nm, respectively.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
In vivo and ex vivo prompt imaging of COX-2 in 1483 HNSCC xenograft tumors. FC (0.2  mg/kg, r.o.) or NIR664 (0.2  mg/kg, r.o.) were injected into nude mice bearing 1483 HNSCC or HCT116 xenograft tumors and imaged at 4 h postinjection under a Xenogen IVIS 200 optical imaging system. In vivo image of (a) 1483 HNSCC xenograft with FC; (b) celecoxib pretreated 1483 HNSCC xenograft with FC; (c) HCT116 xenograft with FC; and (d) 1483 HNSCC xenograft with NIR664. After imaging, tumors were collected by dissection and imaged under a Xenogen IVIS 200 optical imaging system. Ex vivo image of (e) 1483 HNSCC tumor shown in (a); (f) 1483 HNSCC tumor shown in (b); (g) HCT116 tumor shown in (c); and (h) 1483 HNSCC tumor shown in (d). (i) Quantification of tumor uptake of FC by ex vivo image analysis using AMIDE software (n=4, p<0.003).
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
In vivo and ex vivo delayed optical imaging of COX-2 in 1483 HNSCC xenograft tumors. FC was injected into nude mice bearing 1483 HNSCC xenograft tumor on the left hip (0.2  mg/kg, r.o.). The animal was imaged from 3 h to 7 days postinjection of FC under a Xenogen IVIS 200 optical imaging system: (a)–(f) Fluorescence images of a nude mice bearing 1483 HNSCC xenograft at 3 h to 7 days postinjection of FC. (g)–(j) Fluorescence images of tumor, liver, kidney, and muscle from an uninjected animal. (k)–(n) Fluorescence images of tumor, liver, kidney, and muscle from a 3 h animal. (o)–(r) Fluorescence images of tumor, liver, kidney, and muscle from a 7-days animal. (s) Quantification of signals in tumor, liver, kidney, and muscle from uninjected control, 3 h and 7-days animals by AMIDE software (n=4, p=0.004).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Weissleder R., et al. , “In vivo imaging of tumors with protease-activated near-infrared fluorescent probes,” Nat. Biotechnol. 17, 375–378 (1999).NABIF910.1038/7933 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mondol S. B., et al. , “Real-time fluorescence image-guided oncologic surgery,” Adv. Cancer Res. 124, 171–211 (2014).ACRSAJ10.1016/B978-0-12-411638-2.00005-7 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tung C.-H., et al. , “A receptor-targeted near-infrared fluorescence probe for in vivo tumor imaging,” ChemBioChem 3, 784–786 (2002).CBCHFX10.1002/1439-7633(20020802)3:8<784::AID-CBIC784>3.0.CO;2-X - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kubota R., et al. , “Microautoradiographic study for the differentiation of intratumoral macrophages, granulation tissues and cancer cells by the dynamics of fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake,” J. Nucl. Med. 35(1), 104–112 (1994).JNMEAQ - PubMed
    1. Lowe V. J., et al. , “Optimum scanning protocol for FDG-PET evaluation of pulmonary malignancy,” J. Nucl. Med. 36(5), 883–887 (1995).JNMEAQ - PubMed

Publication types