Accuracy of Two Motor Assessments during the First Year of Life in Preterm Infants for Predicting Motor Outcome at Preschool Age
- PMID: 25970619
- PMCID: PMC4430525
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0125854
Accuracy of Two Motor Assessments during the First Year of Life in Preterm Infants for Predicting Motor Outcome at Preschool Age
Abstract
Aim: The primary aim of this study was to investigate the accuracy of the Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS) and Neuro-Sensory Motor Developmental Assessment (NSMDA) over the first year of life for predicting motor impairment at 4 years in preterm children. The secondary aims were to assess the predictive value of serial assessments over the first year and when using a combination of these two assessment tools in follow-up.
Method: Children born <30 weeks' gestation were prospectively recruited and assessed at 4, 8 and 12 months' corrected age using the AIMS and NSMDA. At 4 years' corrected age children were assessed for cerebral palsy (CP) and motor impairment using the Movement Assessment Battery for Children 2nd-edition (MABC-2). We calculated accuracy of the AIMS and NSMDA for predicting CP and MABC-2 scores ≤15th (at-risk of motor difficulty) and ≤5th centile (significant motor difficulty) for each test (AIMS and NSMDA) at 4, 8 and 12 months, for delay on one, two or all three of the time points over the first year, and finally for delay on both tests at each time point.
Results: Accuracy for predicting motor impairment was good for each test at each age, although false positives were common. Motor impairment on the MABC-2 (scores ≤5th and ≤15th) was most accurately predicted by the AIMS at 4 months, whereas CP was most accurately predicted by the NSMDA at 12 months. In regards to serial assessments, the likelihood ratio for motor impairment increased with the number of delayed assessments. When combining both the NSMDA and AIMS the best accuracy was achieved at 4 months, although results were similar at 8 and 12 months.
Interpretation: Motor development during the first year of life in preterm infants assessed with the AIMS and NSMDA is predictive of later motor impairment at preschool age. However, false positives are common and therefore it is beneficial to follow-up children at high risk of motor impairment at more than one time point, or to use a combination of assessment tools.
Trial registration: ACTR.org.au ACTRN12606000252516.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
Similar articles
-
Preterm and term-equivalent age general movements and 1-year neurodevelopmental outcomes for infants born before 30 weeks' gestation.Dev Med Child Neurol. 2018 Jan;60(1):47-53. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.13558. Epub 2017 Sep 21. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2018. PMID: 28940492
-
Predicting motor development in very preterm infants at 12 months' corrected age: the role of qualitative magnetic resonance imaging and general movements assessments.Pediatrics. 2009 Feb;123(2):512-7. doi: 10.1542/peds.2008-0590. Pediatrics. 2009. PMID: 19171616
-
Does the Bayley-III Motor Scale at 2 years predict motor outcome at 4 years in very preterm children?Dev Med Child Neurol. 2013 May;55(5):448-52. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.12049. Epub 2012 Dec 6. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2013. PMID: 23216518
-
Clinical tools used in young infants born very preterm to predict motor and cognitive delay (not cerebral palsy): a systematic review.Dev Med Child Neurol. 2021 Apr;63(4):387-395. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.14730. Epub 2020 Nov 13. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2021. PMID: 33185285
-
Cerebral palsy and developmental coordination disorder in children born preterm.Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014 Apr;19(2):84-9. doi: 10.1016/j.siny.2013.11.005. Epub 2013 Dec 2. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014. PMID: 24290908 Review.
Cited by
-
Motor Development Comparison between Preterm and Full-Term Infants Using Alberta Infant Motor Scale.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 21;20(5):3819. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20053819. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023. PMID: 36900838 Free PMC article.
-
Psychometric properties of clinician-reported and performance-based outcomes cited in a scoping review on spinal manipulation and mobilization for pediatric populations with diverse medical conditions: a systematic review.J Man Manip Ther. 2024 Jun;32(3):255-283. doi: 10.1080/10669817.2023.2269038. Epub 2023 Dec 9. J Man Manip Ther. 2024. PMID: 38070150 Free PMC article.
-
Associations Between Maternal-Foetal Attachment and Infant Developmental Outcomes: A Systematic Review.Matern Child Health J. 2017 Mar;21(3):540-553. doi: 10.1007/s10995-016-2138-2. Matern Child Health J. 2017. PMID: 27456309
-
Predictors of motor developmental milestones during the first year of life.Eur J Pediatr. 2017 Jan;176(1):109-119. doi: 10.1007/s00431-016-2817-4. Epub 2016 Nov 28. Eur J Pediatr. 2017. PMID: 27896427
-
Psychometric properties of the Alberta Infant Motor Scale and culturally adapted or translated versions when used for infant populations internationally: A systematic review.Dev Med Child Neurol. 2025 Feb;67(2):165-176. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.16070. Epub 2024 Sep 5. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2025. PMID: 39234875 Free PMC article.
References
-
- van Haastert IC, de Vries LS, Helders PJ, Jongmans MJ. Early gross motor development of preterm infants according to the Alberta Infant Motor Scale. The Journal of Pediatrics. November 2006;149(5):617–622. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous