Differentiation of metastatic vs degenerative joint disease using semi-quantitative analysis with (18)F-NaF PET/CT in castrate resistant prostate cancer patients
- PMID: 25973337
- PMCID: PMC4396008
Differentiation of metastatic vs degenerative joint disease using semi-quantitative analysis with (18)F-NaF PET/CT in castrate resistant prostate cancer patients
Abstract
Fluorine 18 Sodium Fluoride ((18)F-NaF) (sodium fluoride) PET/CT is a highly sensitive but is a non-specific method for identifying bone metastases. Qualitative scan interpretation using low dose CT for lesion localization is often complicated by the presence of co-existing degenerative joint disease (DJD). A semi-quantitative analysis might help in accurately differentiating benign from metastatic osseous lesions. The aim of the study was to evaluate the clinical utility of (18)F-NaF PET/CT in differentiating DJD from metastatic disease in the skeleton using a qualitative analysis as well as a semi-quantitative approach using the SUVmax and to determine if there is an upper limit of SUVmax value that can reliably differentiate metastases from DJD. Baseline (18)F-NaF PET/CT scans were performed for 17 castrate resistant prostate cancer patients (CRPC). A qualitative as well as semi-quantitative analysis using maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) based on body weight was performed for 65 metastatic and 56 DJD sites identified on the low dose CT scan acquired as a part of whole body PET/CT scan. The SUVmax range in DJD was 2.6-49.9 (mean: 6.2). The SUVmax range for metastatic lesions was 11.2-188 (mean: 160). The SUVmax value for metastatic as well as areas of DJD showed significant variation during treatment. Bone metastases showed statistically significantly higher SUVmax than DJD using a mixed effect regression model. ROC/AUC analysis was performed based on averaging the SUVs over all lesions in each subject. The AUC was found to be fairly high at 0.964 (95% CI: 0.75-0.996). The SUVmax over 50 always represented a bone metastasis and below 12 always represented a site of DJD. The results of our preliminary data show that semi-quantitative analysis is complementary to the qualitative analysis in accurately identifying DJD from metastatic disease. The cut-off SUVmax of 50 can help in differentiating DJD from bone metastases.
Keywords: F-18 NaF; PET/CT; bone metastases; castrate resistant prostate cancer; degenerative joint disease.
Figures





Similar articles
-
Maximum standardized uptake value from quantitative bone single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography in differentiating metastatic and degenerative joint disease of the spine in prostate cancer patients.Ann Nucl Med. 2020 Jan;34(1):39-48. doi: 10.1007/s12149-019-01410-4. Epub 2019 Oct 14. Ann Nucl Med. 2020. PMID: 31612417
-
More advantages in detecting bone and soft tissue metastases from prostate cancer using 18F-PSMA PET/CT.Hell J Nucl Med. 2019 Jan-Apr;22(1):6-9. doi: 10.1967/s002449910952. Epub 2019 Mar 7. Hell J Nucl Med. 2019. PMID: 30843003
-
(18)F Sodium Fluoride PET/CT in Patients with Prostate Cancer: Quantification of Normal Tissues, Benign Degenerative Lesions, and Malignant Lesions.World J Nucl Med. 2016 May-Aug;15(2):102-8. doi: 10.4103/1450-1147.172301. World J Nucl Med. 2016. PMID: 27134560 Free PMC article.
-
18F-NaF-PET/CT and 99mTc-MDP Bone Scintigraphy in the Detection of Bone Metastases in Prostate Cancer.Semin Nucl Med. 2016 Nov;46(6):491-501. doi: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2016.07.003. Epub 2016 Sep 13. Semin Nucl Med. 2016. PMID: 27825429 Review.
-
Evaluation of Prostate Cancer Bone Metastases with 18F-NaF and 18F-Fluorocholine PET/CT.J Nucl Med. 2016 Oct;57(Suppl 3):55S-60S. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.115.169730. J Nucl Med. 2016. PMID: 27694173 Review.
Cited by
-
68Ga-P15-041, A Novel Bone Imaging Agent for Diagnosis of Bone Metastases.Front Oncol. 2021 Nov 25;11:766851. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.766851. eCollection 2021. Front Oncol. 2021. PMID: 34900716 Free PMC article.
-
Therapy assessment of bone metastatic disease in the era of 223radium.Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017 Aug;44(Suppl 1):84-96. doi: 10.1007/s00259-017-3734-0. Epub 2017 May 31. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017. PMID: 28567494 Review.
-
Quantitative Assessment of Early [18F]Sodium Fluoride Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Response to Treatment in Men With Metastatic Prostate Cancer to Bone.J Clin Oncol. 2017 Aug 20;35(24):2829-2837. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.72.2348. Epub 2017 Jun 27. J Clin Oncol. 2017. PMID: 28654366 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Correlation between the maximum standard uptake value and mean Hounsfield unit on single-photon emission computed tomography-computed tomography to discriminate benign and metastatic lesions among patients with breast cancer.Asian Spine J. 2024 Jun;18(3):398-406. doi: 10.31616/asj.2022.0451. Epub 2024 Jun 25. Asian Spine J. 2024. PMID: 38917860 Free PMC article.
-
Quantitative analysis of 18F-NaF dynamic PET/CT cannot differentiate malignant from benign lesions in multiple myeloma.Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017 Sep 1;7(4):148-156. eCollection 2017. Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017. PMID: 28913153 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Padhani A, Husband J. Bone metastases. In: Husband JES, Reznek RH, editors. Imaging in Oncology. Oxford, U.K.: Isis Medical Media Ltd; 1998. pp. 765–787.
-
- Even-Sapir E, Metser U, Mishani E, Lievshitz G, Lerman H, Leibovitch I. The detection of bone metastases in patients with high-risk prostate cancer: 99mTc-MDP planar bone scintigraphy, single- and multi-field-of-view SPECT, 18FfluoridePET, and 18F-fluoride PET/CT. J Nucl Med. 2006;47:287–297. - PubMed
-
- Rybak LD, Rosenthal DI. Radiological imaging for the diagnosis of bone metastases. Q J Nucl Med. 2001;45:53–64. - PubMed
-
- Schirrmeister H, Guhlnamm A, Kotzerke J, Santjohanser C, Kühn T, Kreienberg R, Messer P, Nüssle K, Elsner K, Glatting G, Träger H, Neumaier B, Diederichs C, Reske SN. Early detection and accurate description of extent of metastatic bone disease in breast cancer with fluoride ion and positron emission tomography. J. Clin. Oncol. 1999;17:2381–2389. - PubMed
-
- Hamaoka T, Madewell JE, Podoloff DA, Hortobagyi GN, Ueno NT. Bone imaging in metastatic breast cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 2004;22:2942–2953. - PubMed
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources