Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015;97(6):616-25.
doi: 10.1080/00223891.2015.1038388. Epub 2015 May 15.

Examining the Factor Structure and Structural Invariance of the PANAS Across Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults

Nicholas P Allan  1 , Christopher J Lonigan  1   2 , Beth M Phillips  2   3
Affiliations

Examining the Factor Structure and Structural Invariance of the PANAS Across Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults

Nicholas P Allan et al. J Pers Assess. 2015.

Abstract

It is unclear what factor structure best represents the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) from childhood to adulthood. The PANAS structure was examined in a sample of 555 children (M age = 11.66, SD = 1.24), 608 adolescents (M age = 15.45, SD = 1.09), and 553 young adults (M age = 18.75, SD = 1.00). A partially invariant model consisting of Positive Affect, Fear, and Distress factors best represented the PANAS across all age groups, indicating that the underlying constructs are the same across age but that the factors become increasingly interrelated with increasing age.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Standardized parameter estimates for the three-factor model of PA, Fear, and Distress in children, adolescents, and adults, respectively. PA = Positive Affect. Error terms and residual variances have been omitted for clarity.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Anthony JL, Lonigan CJ, Hooe ES, Phillips BM. An affect-based, hierarchical model of temperament and its relations with internalizing symptomatology. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology. 2002;31:480–490. doi: 10.1207/S15374424JCCP3104_7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bushman BB, Crowley SL. Is the structure of affect similar for younger and older children? Cross-sectional differences in negative and positive affectivity. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment. 2010;28:31–39. doi: 10.1177/0734282909337584. - DOI
    1. Chen FF, Hayes A, Carver CS, Laurenceau JP, Zhang Z. Modeling general and specific variance in multifaceted constructs: A comparison of the bifactor model to other approaches. Journal of Personality. 2012;80:219–251. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2011.00739.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chen FF, West SG, Sousa KH. A comparison of bifactor and second-order models of quality of life. Multivariate Behavioral Research. 2006;41:189–225. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr4102_5. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Crawford JR, Henry JD. The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS): Construct validity, measurement properties and normative data in a large non-clinical sample. British Journal of Clinical Psychology. 2004;43:245–265. doi: 10.1348/0144665031752934. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types