Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015 Apr;39(3):230-7.
doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2015.03.007.

Detection of critical congenital heart defects: Review of contributions from prenatal and newborn screening

Affiliations
Review

Detection of critical congenital heart defects: Review of contributions from prenatal and newborn screening

Richard S Olney et al. Semin Perinatol. 2015 Apr.

Abstract

In 2011, statewide newborn screening programs for critical congenital heart defects began in the United States, and subsequently screening has been implemented widely. In this review, we focus on data reports and collection efforts related to both prenatal diagnosis and newborn screening. Defect-specific, maternal, and geographic factors are associated with variations in prenatal detection, so newborn screening provides a population-wide safety net for early diagnosis. A new web-based repository is collecting information on newborn screening program policies, quality indicators related to screening programs, and specific case-level data on infants with these defects. Birth defects surveillance programs also collect data about critical congenital heart defects, particularly related to diagnostic timing, mortality, and services. Individuals from state programs, federal agencies, and national organizations will be interested in these data to further refine algorithms for screening in normal newborn nurseries, neonatal intensive care settings, and other special populations; and ultimately to evaluate the impact of screening on outcomes.

Keywords: Congenital; Heart defects; Neonatal screening; Population surveillance; Prenatal diagnosis; Public health.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig
Fig
Pooled birth prevalence among live births of primary critical congenital heart defects (CCHD) screening targets, by CCHD type, among population-based birth defects surveillance systems that use active case finding methodologies, United States, 2005–2009. The exact years and number of programs included (range: 11–16) vary by defect. Pooled prevalence was calculated by dividing the total number of cases across programs by total number of combined live births. (Adapted from Mai et al.)

References

    1. Kemper AR, Mahle WT, Martin GR, et al. Strategies for implementing screening for critical congenital heart disease. Pediatrics. 2011;128(5):e1259–e1267. - PubMed
    1. Mai CT, Riehle-Colarusso T, O’Halloran A, et al. Selected birth defects data from population-based birth defects surveillance programs in the United States, 2005-2009: featuring critical congenital heart defects targeted for pulse oximetry screening. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2012;94(12):970–983. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mahle WT, Newburger JW, Matherne GP, et al. Role of pulse oximetry in examining newborns for congenital heart disease: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association and American Academy of Pediatrics. Circulation. 2009;120(5):447–458. - PubMed
    1. Hoffman JI, Kaplan S. The incidence of congenital heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;39(12):1890–1900. - PubMed
    1. Oster ME, Lee KA, Honein MA, Riehle-Colarusso T, Shin M, Correa A. Temporal trends in survival among infants with critical congenital heart defects. Pediatrics. 2013;131(5):e1502–e1508. - PMC - PubMed