Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2015 Nov-Dec;15(6):573-83.
doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2015.03.011. Epub 2015 May 14.

Shared Decision Making in Pediatrics: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Shared Decision Making in Pediatrics: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Kirk D Wyatt et al. Acad Pediatr. 2015 Nov-Dec.

Abstract

Background: Little is known about the impact of interventions to support shared decision making (SDM) with pediatric patients.

Objectives: To summarize the efficacy of SDM interventions in pediatrics on patient-centered outcomes.

Data sources: We searched Ovid Medline, Ovid Embase, Ovid Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Scopus, and Ovid PsycInfo from database inception to December 30, 2013, and performed an environmental scan.

Study eligibility criteria: We included interventions designed to engage pediatric patients, parents, or both in a medical decision, regardless of study design or reported outcomes.

Study appraisal and synthesis methods: We reviewed all studies in duplicate for inclusion, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment. Meta-analysis was performed on 3 outcomes: knowledge, decisional conflict, and satisfaction.

Results: Sixty-one citations describing 54 interventions met eligibility criteria. Fifteen studies reported outcomes such that they were eligible for inclusion in meta-analysis. Heterogeneity across studies was high. Meta-analysis revealed SDM interventions significantly improved knowledge (standardized mean difference [SMD] 1.21, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.26 to 2.17, P = .01) and reduced decisional conflict (SMD -1.20, 95% CI -2.01 to -0.40, P = .003). Interventions showed a nonsignificant trend toward increased satisfaction (SMD 0.37, 95% CI -0.04 to 0.78, P = .08).

Limitations: Included studies were heterogeneous in nature, including their conceptions of SDM.

Conclusions and implications of key findings: A limited evidence base suggests that pediatric SDM interventions improve knowledge and decisional conflict, but their impact on other outcomes is unclear.

Systematic review registration number: PROSPERO CRD42013004761 (http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.asp?ID=CRD42013004761).

Keywords: adolescent; child; child, preschool; decision aids; decision making; decision making, shared; decision support techniques; infant; infant, newborn; pediatrics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types