Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2015 Jul 10;33(20):2239-45.
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.58.8517. Epub 2015 May 18.

Validation and Development of a Modified Breast Graded Prognostic Assessment As a Tool for Survival in Patients With Breast Cancer and Brain Metastases

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Validation and Development of a Modified Breast Graded Prognostic Assessment As a Tool for Survival in Patients With Breast Cancer and Brain Metastases

Ishwaria M Subbiah et al. J Clin Oncol. .

Abstract

Purpose: Several indices have been developed to predict overall survival (OS) in patients with breast cancer with brain metastases, including the breast graded prognostic assessment (breast-GPA), comprising age, tumor subtype, and Karnofsky performance score. However, number of brain metastases-a highly relevant clinical variable-is less often incorporated into the final model. We sought to validate the existing breast-GPA in an independent larger cohort and refine it integrating number of brain metastases.

Patients and methods: Data were retrospectively gathered from a prospectively maintained institutional database. Patients with newly diagnosed brain metastases from 1996 to 2013 were identified. After validating the breast-GPA, multivariable Cox regression and recursive partitioning analysis led to the development of the modified breast-GPA. The performances of the breast-GPA and modified breast-GPA were compared using the concordance index.

Results: In our cohort of 1,552 patients, the breast-GPA was validated as a prognostic tool for OS (P < .001). In multivariable analysis of the breast-GPA and number of brain metastases (> three v ≤ three), both were independent predictors of OS. We therefore developed the modified breast-GPA integrating a fourth clinical parameter. Recursive partitioning analysis reinforced the prognostic significance of these four factors. Concordance indices were 0.78 (95% CI, 0.77 to 0.80) and 0.84 (95% CI, 0.83 to 0.85) for the breast-GPA and modified breast-GPA, respectively (P < .001).

Conclusion: The modified breast-GPA incorporates four simple clinical parameters of high prognostic significance. This index has an immediate role in the clinic as a formative part of the clinician's discussion of prognosis and direction of care and as a potential patient selection tool for clinical trials.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest are found in the article online at www.jco.org. Author contributions are found at the end of this article.

Figures

Fig 1.
Fig 1.
Kaplan-Meier overall survival (OS) curves for breast graded prognostic assessment (breast GPA) in MD Anderson validation cohort. Table lists 1-, 2-, and 3-year OS estimates and median OS in months by breast GPA group (concordance index, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.77 to 0.80).
Fig 2.
Fig 2.
Recursive partitioning analysis model for modified breast graded prognostic assessment. Internal nodes presented in circles; terminal nodes presented in rectangles. Top number within each node is number of patients in node; bottom number is median overall survival (OS) in months and 95% CI. Table lists 1-, 2-, and 3-year OS estimates and median OS in months in terminal nodes. HER2, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; KPS, Karnofsky performance score.
Fig 3.
Fig 3.
Kaplan-Meier overall survival (OS) curves for modified breast graded prognostic assessment (modified breast-GPA) in MD Anderson cohort. Table lists 1-, 2-, and 3-year OS estimates and median OS in months by breast GPA group (concordance index, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.83 to 0.85).

References

    1. Pestalozzi BC. Brain metastases and subtypes of breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2009;20:803–805. - PubMed
    1. Nabors LB, Ammirati M, Bierman PJ, et al. Central nervous system cancers. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2013;11:1114–1151. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dawood S, Broglio K, Esteva FJ, et al. Survival among women with triple receptor-negative breast cancer and brain metastases. Ann Oncol. 2009;20:621–627. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kennecke H, Yerushalmi R, Woods R, et al. Metastatic behavior of breast cancer subtypes. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:3271–3277. - PubMed
    1. Tham YL, Sexton K, Kramer R, et al. Primary breast cancer phenotypes associated with propensity for central nervous system metastases. Cancer. 2006;107:696–704. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms