Comparison of the diagnostic yield and outcomes between standard 8 h capsule endoscopy and the new 12 h capsule endoscopy for investigating small bowel pathology
- PMID: 25987777
- PMCID: PMC4427676
- DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i18.5542
Comparison of the diagnostic yield and outcomes between standard 8 h capsule endoscopy and the new 12 h capsule endoscopy for investigating small bowel pathology
Abstract
Aim: To evaluate the completion rate and diagnostic yield of the PillCam SB2-ex in comparison to the PillCam SB2.
Methods: Two hundred cases using the 8-h PillCam SB2 were retrospectively compared to 200 cases using the 12 h PillCam SB2-ex at a tertiary academic center. Endoscopically placed capsules were excluded from the study. Demographic information, indications for capsule endoscopy, capsule type, study length, completion of exam, clinically significant findings, timestamp of most distant finding, and significant findings beyond 8 h were recorded.
Results: The 8 and 12 h capsule groups were well matched respectively for both age (70.90 ± 14.19 vs 71.93 ± 13.80, P = 0.46) and gender (45.5% vs 48% male, P = 0.69). The most common indications for the procedure in both groups were anemia and obscure gastrointestinal bleeding. PillCam SB2-ex had a significantly higher completion rate than PillCam SB2 (88% vs 79.5%, P = 0.03). Overall, the diagnostic yield was greater for the 8 h capsule (48.5% for SB2 vs 35% for SB2-ex, P = 0.01). In 4/70 (5.7%) of abnormal SB2-ex exams the clinically significant finding was noted in the small bowel beyond the 8 h mark.
Conclusion: In our study, we found the PillCam SB2-ex to have a significantly increased completion rate, though without any improvement in diagnostic yield compared to the PillCam SB2.
Keywords: Capsule endoscopy; Obscure gastrointestinal bleeding; PillCam SB2.
Comment in
-
PillCam® SB3 capsule: Does the increased frame rate eliminate the risk of missing lesions?World J Gastroenterol. 2016 Mar 14;22(10):3066-8. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i10.3066. World J Gastroenterol. 2016. PMID: 26973404 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Cave DR, Fleischer DE, Leighton JA, Faigel DO, Heigh RI, Sharma VK, Gostout CJ, Rajan E, Mergener K, Foley A, et al. A multicenter randomized comparison of the Endocapsule and the Pillcam SB. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;68:487–494. - PubMed
-
- Pioche M, Gaudin JL, Filoche B, Jacob P, Lamouliatte H, Lapalus MG, Duburque C, Chaput U, Ben Soussan E, Daudet J, et al. Prospective, randomized comparison of two small-bowel capsule endoscopy systems in patients with obscure GI bleeding. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;73:1181–1188. - PubMed
-
- Hindryckx P, Botelberge T, De Vos M, De Looze D. Clinical impact of capsule endoscopy on further strategy and long-term clinical outcome in patients with obscure bleeding. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;68:98–104. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
