Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 May 19;5(5):e006606.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006606.

Assessment of the feasibility of an ultra-low power, wireless digital patch for the continuous ambulatory monitoring of vital signs

Affiliations

Assessment of the feasibility of an ultra-low power, wireless digital patch for the continuous ambulatory monitoring of vital signs

Miguel Hernandez-Silveira et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Background and objectives: Vital signs are usually recorded at 4-8 h intervals in hospital patients, and deterioration between measurements can have serious consequences. The primary study objective was to assess agreement between a new ultra-low power, wireless and wearable surveillance system for continuous ambulatory monitoring of vital signs and a widely used clinical vital signs monitor. The secondary objective was to examine the system's ability to automatically identify and reject invalid physiological data.

Setting: Single hospital centre.

Participants: Heart and respiratory rate were recorded over 2 h in 20 patients undergoing elective surgery and a second group of 41 patients with comorbid conditions, in the general ward.

Outcome measures: Primary outcome measures were limits of agreement and bias. The secondary outcome measure was proportion of data rejected.

Results: The digital patch provided reliable heart rate values in the majority of patients (about 80%) with normal sinus rhythm, and in the presence of abnormal ECG recordings (excluding aperiodic arrhythmias such as atrial fibrillation). The mean difference between systems was less than ±1 bpm in all patient groups studied. Although respiratory data were more frequently rejected as invalid because of the high sensitivity of impedance pneumography to motion artefacts, valid rates were reported for 50% of recordings with a mean difference of less than ±1 brpm compared with the bedside monitor. Correlation between systems was statistically significant (p<0.0001) for heart and respiratory rate, apart from respiratory rate in patients with atrial fibrillation (p=0.02).

Conclusions: Overall agreement between digital patch and clinical monitor was satisfactory, as was the efficacy of the system for automatic rejection of invalid data. Wireless monitoring technologies, such as the one tested, may offer clinical value when implemented as part of wider hospital systems that integrate and support existing clinical protocols and workflows.

Keywords: GENERAL MEDICINE (see Internal Medicine).

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The end-to-end monitoring system for wireless continuous monitoring of vital signs.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Comparison of heart and respiratory rate data between the wireless, digital patch monitoring system and the reference bedside monitor during a 2 h monitoring period in patients who had undergone elective surgery (group 1 patients).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Comparison of heart and respiratory rate data between the wireless, digital patch monitoring system and the reference bedside monitor during a 2 h monitoring period in patients with low voltage/variable QRS morphology (A) and patients with atrial fibrillation (B).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Comparison of heart and respiratory rate data between the wireless, digital patch monitoring system and the reference bedside monitor during a 2 h monitoring period in patients with a high body mass index (>30 kg/m2; A) and patients with diabetes (B).

References

    1. National Confidential Enquiry into Patient Outcome and Death, 2005. An acute problem. http://www.ncepod.org.uk/2005aap.htm (accessed Mar 2015). - PubMed
    1. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, 2007. Acutely ill patients in hospital: recognition of and response to acute illness in adults in hospital. http://www.nice.org.uk/Guidance/CG50/NiceGuidance/pdf (accessed Mar 2015).
    1. Goldhill DR, White SA, Sumner A. Physiological values and procedures in the 24 hours before ICU admission from the wards. Anaesthesia 1999;54:529–34. 10.1046/j.1365-2044.1999.00837.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. McQuillan P, Pilkington S, Allan A et al. . Confidential inquiry into quality of care before admission to intensive care. BMJ 1998;316:1853–8. 10.1136/bmj.316.7148.1853 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gao H, McDonnell A, Harrison DA et al. . Systematic review and evaluation of physiological track and trigger warning systems for identifying at-risk patients on the ward. Intensive Care Med 2007;33:667–79. 10.1007/s00134-007-0532-3 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources