Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 May 19;5(5):e007726.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007726.

Why do patients with 'primary care sensitive' problems access ambulance services? A systematic mapping review of the literature

Matthew J Booker  1 , Ali R G Shaw  1 , Sarah Purdy  1
Affiliations

Why do patients with 'primary care sensitive' problems access ambulance services? A systematic mapping review of the literature

Matthew J Booker et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objective: Emergency ambulance use for problems that could be managed in primary care continues to rise owing to complex reasons that are poorly understood. The objective of this systematic review is to draw together published evidence across a variety of study methodologies and settings to gain a better understanding of why patients seek help from ambulance services for these problems.

Design: Systematic searches were undertaken across the MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsychINFO, CINAHL, Health Management Information Consortium and Health Management Information Service publication databases. Google Scholar, Web of Science, OpenSigle, EThOS and DART databases were also systematically searched for reports, proceedings, book chapters and theses, along with hand-searching of grey literature sources. Studies were included if they reported on findings examining patient, carer, health professional or service management interactions with ambulance services for primary care problems. All study methodologies and perspectives were of interest. Data were extracted, quality assessed and systematically mapped according to key findings through generation of an iterative framework.

Results: A total of 31 studies met inclusion criteria. Findings were summarised across 5 broad categories: factors associated with individual patients; actions of care-givers and bystanders; population-level factors; health infrastructure factors; challenges faced by health professionals. A number of subcategories were developed to explore these factors in more detail.

Conclusions: This review reports important factors that may impact on ambulance use for primary care problems across a global setting, including demographic measures associated with deprivation, minority status and individual social circumstances. Categorising ambulance calls for primary care problems as 'inappropriate' is context dependant and may be unhelpful. Potential implications for triage and risk management strategies are discussed.

Keywords: Ambulances; Emergency Medical Services; Primary Health Care; Urgent Care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) flow diagram for paper screening.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Relationships between categories derived from the mapping process.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Pickering A, Mason S, Turner J et al. . A comparative review of ambulance service best practice. Office of the Strategic Health Authorities; 2009. http://www.nhsimas.nhs.uk/fileadmin/Files/IST/ESR_A_comparative_review_o... (accessed Dec 2014).
    1. Department of Health. Taking healthcare to the patient: transforming NHS Ambulance Services. 2005. http://ircp.info/Portals/11/Future/NHS%20EMS%20Policy%20Recommendation20... (accessed Dec 2014).
    1. Department of Health. Tackling demand together: a toolkit for improving urgent and emergency care pathways by understanding increases in 999 demand. 2009. http://www.dh.gov.uk/prod_consum_dh/groups/dh_digitalassets/documents/di... (accessed Dec 2014).
    1. NHS England. High quality care for all, now and for future generations: transforming urgent and emergency care services in England. The evidence base from the urgent and emergency care review 2013. http://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/urg-emerg-care-ev-b... (accessed Dec 2014).
    1. Snooks H, Wrigley H, George S et al. . Appropriateness of use of emergency ambulances. J Accid Emerg Med 1998;15:212–18. 10.1136/emj.15.4.212 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources