Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Jul;17(3):265-73.
doi: 10.7162/S1809-97772013000300006.

Comparison of videonasoendoscopy and auditory-perceptual evaluation of speech in individuals with cleft lip/palate

Affiliations

Comparison of videonasoendoscopy and auditory-perceptual evaluation of speech in individuals with cleft lip/palate

Lauren Medeiros Paniagua et al. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2013 Jul.

Abstract

Introduction: The velopharyngeal sphincter (VPS) is a muscle belt located between the oropharynx and the nasopharynx. Investigations of velopharyngeal function should include an auditory-perceptual evaluation and at least 1 instrument-based evaluation such as videonasoendoscopy.

Aim: To compare the findings of auditory-perceptual evaluation (hypernasality) and videonasoendoscopy (gap size) in individuals with cleft lip/palate.

Method: This was a retrospective, cross-sectional study assessing 49 subjects, of both sexes, with cleft lip/palate followed up at the Otorhinolaryngology Service and the Speech Therapy outpatient clinic of Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (HCPA). The results from the auditory-perceptual evaluation and the videonasoendoscopy test were compared with respect to the VPS gap size.

Results: Subjects with moderate/severe hypernasality had more severe velopharyngeal closure impairment than those with a less severe condition. The interaction between hypernasality severity and the presence of other speech disorders (p = 0.035), whether compensatory and/or obligatory, increased the likelihood of having a moderate-to-large gap in the velopharyngeal closure.

Conclusions: We observed an association between the findings of these 2 evaluation methods.

Keywords: Cleft Palate; Communication Disorders; Evaluation; Velopharyngeal Sphincter.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Altmann E BC Anatomia e fisiologia do esfíncter velofaríngeo Carapicuíba: Pró-fono; 1997. p. 133–56
    1. Lofiego J L. Rio de Janeiro: Revinter; 1992. Fissura Labiopalatina: avaliação, diagnóstico e tratamento fonoaudiológico.
    1. Silva D P. et al.Aspectos patofisiológicos do esfíncter velofaríngeo. Arq Int Otorrrinolaringol. 2008;12(3):426–35.
    1. Altmann E BC Ramos A LNF Khoury R BF Avaliação Fonoaudiológica Carapicuíba: Pró- Fono; 2005. p. 325–66.
    1. Finkelstein Y. et al.Axial Configuration of velopharyngeal valve and its valving mechanism. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1995;32:299–305. - PubMed