Intraoperative Neural Response Telemetry and Neural Recovery Function: a Comparative Study between Adults and Children
- PMID: 25992145
- PMCID: PMC4392512
- DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1372509
Intraoperative Neural Response Telemetry and Neural Recovery Function: a Comparative Study between Adults and Children
Abstract
Introduction Neural response telemetry (NRT) is a method of capturing the action potential of the distal portion of the auditory nerve in cochlear implant (CI) users, using the CI itself to elicit and record the answers. In addition, it can also measure the recovery function of the auditory nerve (REC), that is, the refractory properties of the nerve. It is not clear in the literature whether the responses from adults are the same as those from children. Objective To compare the results of NRT and REC between adults and children undergoing CI surgery. Methods Cross-sectional, descriptive, and retrospective study of the results of NRT and REC for patients undergoing IC at our service. The NRT is assessed by the level of amplitude (microvolts) and REC as a function of three parameters: A (saturation level, in microvolts), t0 (absolute refractory period, in seconds), and tau (curve of the model function), measured in three electrodes (apical, medial, and basal). Results Fifty-two patients were evaluated with intraoperative NRT (26 adults and 26 children), and 24 with REC (12 adults and 12 children). No statistically significant difference was found between intraoperative responses of adults and children for NRT or for REC's three parameters, except for parameter A of the basal electrode. Conclusion The results of intraoperative NRT and REC were not different between adults and children, except for parameter A of the basal electrode.
Keywords: cochlear implants; deafness; telemetry.
Similar articles
-
Neural Recovery Function of the Auditory Nerve in Cochlear Implant Surgery: Comparison between Prelingual and Postlingual Patients.Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2020 Oct;24(4):e444-e449. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1702974. Epub 2020 Apr 24. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2020. PMID: 33101509 Free PMC article.
-
Neural recovery function of the auditory nerve in cochlear implant surgery: Comparison between different regions of the cochlea.Cochlear Implants Int. 2022 Jul;23(4):232-240. doi: 10.1080/14670100.2022.2054564. Epub 2022 Mar 25. Cochlear Implants Int. 2022. PMID: 35337245
-
Does pediatric cochlear implant insertion technique affect intraoperative neural response telemetry thresholds?Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2015 Sep;79(9):1404-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2015.05.038. Epub 2015 Jul 2. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2015. PMID: 26166451
-
Neural response telemetry with the nucleus CI24M cochlear implant.Laryngoscope. 1999 Nov;109(11):1755-9. doi: 10.1097/00005537-199911000-00006. Laryngoscope. 1999. PMID: 10569402
-
A different approach to using neural response telemetry for automated cochlear implant processor programming.Ear Hear. 2005 Aug;26(4 Suppl):38S-44S. doi: 10.1097/00003446-200508001-00006. Ear Hear. 2005. PMID: 16082266 Review.
Cited by
-
How differ eCAP types in cochlear implants users with and without inner ear malformations: amplitude growth function, spread of excitation, refractory recovery function.Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2025 Feb;282(2):731-742. doi: 10.1007/s00405-024-08971-9. Epub 2024 Sep 16. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2025. PMID: 39284939
-
Is the spread of excitation different between adults and children cochlear implants users?Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024 Jul;281(7):3491-3498. doi: 10.1007/s00405-024-08451-0. Epub 2024 Jan 19. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024. PMID: 38240771
-
Anaesthesia for major middle ear surgery.BJA Educ. 2019 May;19(5):136-143. doi: 10.1016/j.bjae.2019.01.006. Epub 2019 Mar 6. BJA Educ. 2019. PMID: 33456882 Free PMC article. Review. No abstract available.
-
Neural Recovery Function of the Auditory Nerve in Cochlear Implant Surgery: Comparison between Prelingual and Postlingual Patients.Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2020 Oct;24(4):e444-e449. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1702974. Epub 2020 Apr 24. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2020. PMID: 33101509 Free PMC article.
-
Comparing Audiological Outcomes of Conventional and AI-Upgraded Cochlear Implant Speech Processors.Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024 Oct;76(5):4356-4364. doi: 10.1007/s12070-024-04860-z. Epub 2024 Jul 8. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024. PMID: 39376318
References
-
- Ferrari D V, Sameshima K, Costa Filho O A, Bevilacqua M C. Neural response telemetry on the nucleus 24 multichannel cochlear implant system: literature review. Rev Bras Otorrinolaringol. 2004;70(1):112–118.
-
- Kutscher K, Goffi-Gomez M V, Befi-Lopes D M, Tsuji R K, Bento R F. Cochlear implant: correlation of nerve function recovery, auditory deprivation and etiology. Pro Fono. 2010;22(4):473–478. - PubMed
-
- Botros A, Psarros C. Neural response telemetry reconsidered: II. The influence of neural population on the ECAP recovery function and refractoriness. Ear Hear. 2010;31(3):380–391. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources