Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 May 20;10(5):e0125208.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0125208. eCollection 2015.

Impact of Open Data Policies on Consent to Participate in Human Subjects Research: Discrepancies between Participant Action and Reported Concerns

Affiliations

Impact of Open Data Policies on Consent to Participate in Human Subjects Research: Discrepancies between Participant Action and Reported Concerns

Jorden A Cummings et al. PLoS One. .

Erratum in

Abstract

Research outlets are increasingly adopting open data policies as a requisite for publication, including studies with human subjects data. We investigated whether open data policies influence participants' rate of consent by randomly assigning participants to view consent forms with and without discussion of open data policies. No participants declined to participate, regardless of condition, nor did rates of drop-out vs. completion vary between conditions. Furthermore, no significant change in potential consent rates was reported when participants were openly asked about the influence of open data policies on their likelihood of consent. However, follow-up analyses indicated possible poor attention to consent forms, consistent with previous research. Moreover, thematic analysis of participants' considerations of open data policy indicated multiple considerations such as concerns regarding confidentiality, anonymity, data security, and study sensitivity. The impact of open data policies on participation raises complex issues at the intersection of ethics and scientific innovation. We conclude by encouraging researchers to consider participants as stakeholders in open data policy and by providing recommendations for open data policies in human subjects research.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

References

    1. Holdren J. Memorandum for the heads of executive departments and agencies: Increasing access to the results of federally funded scientific research. Office of Science and Technology Policy. 2013. Available: http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/ostp_publi.... Accessed 2014 Apr 15.
    1. Molloy JC. The Open Knowledge Foundation: Open data means better science. PLoS Bio. 2011; 9 (12):e1001195 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001195 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gurstein MB. Open data: Empowering the empowered of effective data use for everyone? First Monday. 2011;16(2). 10.5210/fm.v6i2.3316 - DOI
    1. Harrison C. GlaxoSmithKline opens the door on clinical data sharing. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2012;11(12): 891–892. 10.1038/nrd3907 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ross JS, Krumholtz HM. Ushering in a new era of open science through data sharing. JAMA. 2013;309(13): 1355–1356. 10.1001/jama.2013.1299 - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources