Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Sep;21(6):323-30.
doi: 10.1177/1357633X15582108. Epub 2015 May 20.

Electronic consultations (e-consults) to improve access to specialty care: a systematic review and narrative synthesis

Affiliations

Electronic consultations (e-consults) to improve access to specialty care: a systematic review and narrative synthesis

Varsha G Vimalananda et al. J Telemed Telecare. 2015 Sep.

Abstract

Background: We define electronic consultations ("e-consults") as asynchronous, consultative, provider-to-provider communications within a shared electronic health record (EHR) or web-based platform. E-consults are intended to improve access to specialty expertise for patients and providers without the need for a face-to-face visit. Our goal was to systematically review and summarize the literature describing the use and effects of e-consults.

Methods: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and CINAHL for studies related to e-consults published between 1990 through December 2014. Three reviewers identified empirical studies and system descriptions, including articles on systems that used a shared EHR or web-based platform, connected providers in the same health system, were used for two-way provider communication, and were text-based.

Results: Our final review included 27 articles. Twenty-two were research studies and five were system descriptions. Eighteen originated from one of three sites with well-developed e-consult programs. Most studies reported on workflow impact, timeliness of specialty input, and/or provider perceptions of e-consults. E-consultations are used in a variety of ways within and across medical centers. They provide timely access to specialty care and are well-received by primary care providers.

Discussion: E-consults are feasible in a variety of settings, flexible in their application, and facilitate timely specialty advice. More extensive and rigorous studies are needed to inform the e-consult process and describe its effect on access to specialty visits, cost and clinical outcomes.

Keywords: e-consults; remote consultation; teleconsulting; telehealth; telemedicine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
PRISMA flow diagram for literature on e-consults.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Basic steps of an e-consultation (e-consult). The flow diagram indicates the steps involved in a typical e-consult, though not all the steps occur for every e-consult in every system. PCPs and other types of requesting providers may judge it necessary to discuss the decision to place an e-consult with the patient. They request the e-consult within the EHR or secure Web-based portal. The request may be templated, rely on free text entry of relevant data, or both. The specialist receives and reviews the e-consult, referring if appropriate and feasible to the EHR for supporting information. The specialist has the option to arrange for or suggest a face-to-face specialty clinic visit, complete and deliver the e-consult electronically, or request additional information which would inform either decision. Additional information may include details of the history, exam, or test results, but may also include recommendations for work-up and testing that can be completed prior to a face-to-face consultative visit.

References

    1. Di Cerbo A, Morales-Medina JC, Palmieri B, Iannitti T. Narrative review of telemedicine consultation in medical practice. Patient Prefer Adherence 2015; 9: 65–75. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Amadi-Obi A, Gilligan P, Owens N, O’Donnell C. Telemedicine in pre-hospital care: a review of telemedicine applications in the pre-hospital environment. Int J Emerg Med 2014; 7: 29–29. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Golub RM. Curbside consultations and the viaduct effect. JAMA 1998; 280: 929–30. - PubMed
    1. Weiss N. E-mail consultation: clinical, financial, legal, and ethical implications. Surg Neurol 2004; 61: 455–9; discussion 9. - PubMed
    1. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Bmj 2009; 339: b2535–b2535. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types