Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2015 Jul;42(2):188-202.
doi: 10.1111/apt.13243. Epub 2015 May 20.

Population pharmacokinetics-pharmacodynamics of vedolizumab in patients with ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Population pharmacokinetics-pharmacodynamics of vedolizumab in patients with ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease

M Rosario et al. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2015 Jul.

Erratum in

  • Corrigendum.
    [No authors listed] [No authors listed] Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2015 Nov;42(9):1135. doi: 10.1111/apt.13365. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2015. PMID: 26427757 Free PMC article.

Abstract

Background: Vedolizumab, an anti-α(4)β(7) integrin monoclonal antibody (mAb), is indicated for treating patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD). As higher therapeutic mAb concentrations have been associated with greater efficacy in inflammatory bowel disease, understanding determinants of vedolizumab clearance may help to optimise dosing.

Aims: To characterise vedolizumab pharmacokinetics in patients with UC and CD, to identify clinically relevant determinants of vedolizumab clearance, and to describe the pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationship using population modelling.

Methods: Data from a phase 1 healthy volunteer study, a phase 2 UC study, and 3 phase 3 UC/CD studies were included. Population pharmacokinetic analysis for repeated measures was conducted using nonlinear mixed effects modelling. Results from the base model, developed using extensive phase 1 and 2 data, were used to develop the full covariate model, which was fit to sparse phase 3 data.

Results: Vedolizumab pharmacokinetics was described by a 2-compartment model with parallel linear and nonlinear elimination. Using reference covariate values, linear elimination half-life of vedolizumab was 25.5 days; linear clearance (CL(L)) was 0.159 L/day for UC and 0.155 L/day for CD; central compartment volume of distribution (V(c)) was 3.19 L; and peripheral compartment volume of distribution was 1.66 L. Interindividual variabilities (%CV) were 35% for CLL and 19% for V(c); residual variance was 24%. Only extreme albumin and body weight values were identified as potential clinically important predictors of CL(L).

Conclusions: Population pharmacokinetic parameters were similar in patients with moderately to severely active UC and CD. This analysis supports use of vedolizumab fixed dosing in these patients. Clinicaltrials.gov Identifiers: NCT01177228; NCT00783718 (GEMINI 1); NCT00783692 (GEMINI 2); NCT01224171 (GEMINI 3).

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Median (interquartile range) of observed vedolizumab trough serum concentration vs. nominal sampling time in patients with UC (GEMINI 1) and patients with CD (GEMINI 2) during maintenance treatment with placebo or vedolizumab 300 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W) or every 8 weeks (Q8W). All patients (including those in the placebo group) received 2 doses of vedolizumab 300 mg during induction (at weeks 0 and 2). The median value is shown as a point and the interquartile range is represented by a vertical bar.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Diagrammatic representation of the population pharmacokinetic model of vedolizumab. Conc, vedolizumab concentration; K m, concentration at half‐maximum elimination rate; V max, maximum elimination rate.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Distribution of individual vedolizumab linear clearance (CLL) estimates from the final population pharmacokinetic model in patients with UC and patients with CD.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Goodness‐of‐fit plots: observed vedolizumab serum concentration vs. population and individual predicted vedolizumab concentration from the final population pharmacokinetic model. Values are shown as points with a dashed pink loess trend line through the data. A line of identity (solid black) is shown for reference.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Effect of covariates on vedolizumab linear clearance (CLL). Each point and line represent the median and 95% credible interval, respectively, of the Bayesian posterior distribution of normalised samples of vedolizumab CLL adjusted for the covariate. The reference individual weighs 70 kg; is 40 years old; has an albumin level of 4 g/dL, a faecal calprotectin level of 700 mg/kg, a CDAI score of 300 (for patient with CD), a partial Mayo score of 6 (for patient with UC), and no concomitant therapy use; and is ADA negative and TNFα antagonist therapy naïve. Albumin: 2.7, 3.2, 3.7, 4.2 and 4.7 g/dL represent the 6th, 18th, 70th, 85th, and 98.5th percentiles, respectively, of baseline albumin levels for patients in GEMINI 1, 2, and 3. Weight: 40, 60, 80, 100, and 120 kg represent the 1.5th, 30th, 71st, 92nd and 98th percentiles, respectively, of baseline weight values for patients in GEMINI 1, 2, and 3. The vertical black line is drawn at the reference point estimate, and the shaded region is ± 25% of the reference point estimate chosen to represent an uncertainty range of clinical unimportance.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Individual vedolizumab linear clearance (CLL) estimates by Mayo endoscopic subscore at the end of induction (week 6) for patients with UC (GEMINI 1). Midlines represent medians. Box limits represent 25th and 75th percentiles. Whiskers (error bars) represent highest and lowest points within 1.5 × interquartile range. Individual points represent outliers.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Receptor (α4β7) saturation plot: observed MAdCAM‐1 vs. observed vedolizumab serum concentration in patients with UC (GEMINI 1) and patients with CD (GEMINI 2). Baseline data are included.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Observed MAdCAM‐1 vs. time for patients with UC (GEMINI 1) and patients with CD (GEMINI 2). Upper left panel: patients received placebo during induction and maintenance; upper right panel: patients received 2 doses of vedolizumab 300 mg during induction and vedolizumab 300 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W) during maintenance; lower left panel: patients received 2 doses of vedolizumab 300 mg during induction and vedolizumab 300 mg every 8 weeks (Q8W) during maintenance; lower right panel: patients received 2 doses of vedolizumab 300 mg during induction and placebo during maintenance.

References

    1. Soler D, Chapman T, Yang LL, Wyant T, Egan R, Fedyk ER. The binding specificity and selective antagonism of vedolizumab, an anti‐alpha4beta7 integrin therapeutic antibody in development for inflammatory bowel diseases. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2009; 330: 864–75. - PubMed
    1. Paul S, Moreau AC, Del Tedesco E, et al Pharmacokinetics of adalimumab in inflammatory bowel diseases: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2014; 20: 1288–95. - PubMed
    1. Ordas I, Mould DR, Feagan BG, Sandborn WJ. Anti‐TNF Monoclonal Antibodies in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Pharmacokinetics‐Based Dosing Paradigms. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2012; 91: 635–46. - PubMed
    1. Colombel JF, Feagan BG, Sandborn WJ, Van Assche G, Robinson AM. Therapeutic drug monitoring of biologics for inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2012a; 18: 349–58. - PubMed
    1. Feagan BG, Greenberg GR, Wild G, et al Treatment of active Crohn's disease with MLN0002, a humanized antibody to the alpha4beta7 integrin. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2008; 6: 1370–7. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data