Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015;33(4):433-66.
doi: 10.1080/07347332.2015.1046012.

Self-Reported Sexual Function Measures Administered to Female Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review, 2008-2014

Affiliations

Self-Reported Sexual Function Measures Administered to Female Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review, 2008-2014

Diana D Jeffery et al. J Psychosoc Oncol. 2015.

Abstract

A systematic review was conducted to identify and characterize self-reported sexual function (SF) measures administered to women with a history of cancer. Using 2009 PRISMA guidelines, we searched electronic bibliographic databases for quantitative studies published January 2008-September 2014 that used a self-reported measure of SF, or a quality of life (QOL) measure that contained at least 1 item pertaining to SF. Of 1,487 articles initially identified, 171 were retained. The studies originated in 36 different countries with 23% from US-based authors. Most studies focused on women treated for breast, gynecologic, or colorectal cancer. About 70% of the articles examined SF as the primary focus; the remaining examined QOL, menopausal symptoms, or compared treatment modalities. We identified 37 measures that assessed at least one domain of SF, eight of which were dedicated SF measures developed with cancer patients. Almost one third of the studies used EORTC QLQ modules to assess SF, and another third used the Female Sexual Function Inventory. There were few commonalities among studies, though nearly all demonstrated worse SF after cancer treatment or compared to healthy controls. QOL measures are better suited to screening while dedicated SF questionnaires provide data for more in depth assessment. This systematic review will assist oncology clinicians and researchers in their selection of measures of SF and encourage integration of this quality of life domain in patient care.

Keywords: cancer; females; psychosocial; quality of life; sexual function.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Article selection

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Adams J, DeJesus Y, Trujillo M, Cole F. Assessing sexual dimensions in Hispanic women. Development of an instrument. Cancer Nursing. 1997;20(4):251–259. - PubMed
    1. Althof SE, Parish SJ. Clinical interviewing techniques and sexuality questionnaires for male and female cancer patients. Journal of Sexual Medicine. 2013;10(Suppl 1):35–42. - PubMed
    1. Andersen BL, Lachenbruch PA, Anderson B, deProsse C. Sexual dysfunction and signs of gynecologic cancer. Cancer. 1986;57(9):1880–1886. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Arrington R, Cofrancesco J, Wu AW. Questionnaires to measure sexual quality of life. Quality of Life Research. 2004;13:1643–1658. - PubMed
    1. Assessment CenterSM. [Accessed February 12, 2015]; (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.assessmentcenter.net.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources