Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Mar;31(2):192-204.
doi: 10.1093/heapol/czv041. Epub 2015 May 20.

A qualitative study of the role of workplace and interpersonal trust in shaping service quality and responsiveness in Zambian primary health centres

Affiliations

A qualitative study of the role of workplace and interpersonal trust in shaping service quality and responsiveness in Zambian primary health centres

Stephanie M Topp et al. Health Policy Plan. 2016 Mar.

Abstract

Background: Human decisions, actions and relationships that invoke trust are at the core of functional and productive health systems. Although widely studied in high-income settings, comparatively few studies have explored the influence of trust on health system performance in low- and middle-income countries. This study examines how workplace and inter-personal trust impact service quality and responsiveness in primary health services in Zambia.

Methods: This multi-case study included four health centres selected for urban, peri-urban and rural characteristics. Case data included provider interviews (60); patient interviews (180); direct observation of facility operations (two weeks/centre) and key informant interviews (14) that were recorded and transcribed verbatim. Case-based thematic analysis incorporated inductive and deductive coding.

Results: Findings demonstrated that providers had weak workplace trust influenced by a combination of poor working conditions, perceptions of low pay and experiences of inequitable or inefficient health centre management. Weak trust in health centre managers' organizational capacity and fairness contributed to resentment amongst many providers and promoted a culture of blame-shifting and one-upmanship that undermined teamwork and enabled disrespectful treatment of patients. Although patients expressed a high degree of trust in health workers' clinical capacity, repeated experiences of disrespectful or unresponsive care undermined patients' trust in health workers' service values and professionalism. Lack of patient-provider trust prompted some patients to circumvent clinic systems in an attempt to secure better or more timely care.

Conclusion: Lack of resourcing and poor leadership were key factors leading to providers' weak workplace trust and contributed to often-poor quality services, driving a perverse cycle of negative patient-provider relations across the four sites. Findings highlight the importance of investing in both structural factors and organizational management to strengthen providers' trust in their employer(s) and colleagues, as an entry-point for developing both the capacity and a work culture oriented towards respectful and patient-centred care.

Keywords: Health systems; primary health care; service delivery; trust.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Typical administrative structure for a Zambian primary health centre OPD, outpatient department; MCH, maternal and child health department; ART, antiretroviral (for HIV); TB, tuberculosis; EHT, environmental health technologist → Solid-line arrows indicate lines of authority from the top down — Dotted lines indicate lay or auxiliary workers with positions sanctioned but not officially financed by MOH
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Interactions between weak workplace and patient–provider trust impact on service quality and responsiveness

References

    1. Anderson LA, Dedrick RF. 1990. Development of the trust in physician scale - a measure to assess interpersonal-trust in patient-physician relationships. Psychological Reports 67:1091–100. - PubMed
    1. Atun R, Menabde N. 2008. Health systems and systems thinking. In: Cocker R, Atun R, McKee M. (eds). Health Systems and the Challenge of Communicable Disease: Experiences from Europe and Latin America. Maidenhead, Berkshire: Open University Press, 121–40.
    1. Brockner J, Wiesenfeld BM. 1996. An integrative framework for explaining reactions to decisions: interactive effects of outcomes and procedures. Psychological Bulletin 120:189–208. - PubMed
    1. Campbell C. 1996. Trust must be developed in the workplace. Quality Progress 29:8.
    1. Creed DR, Miles RE. 1996. Trust in organizations: a conceptual framework linking organizational forms, managerial philosophies, and the opportunity costs of controls. In: Kramer RM, Tyler TR. (eds). Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 16–38.

Publication types