Measuring the cognitive resources consumed per second for real-time lie-production and recollection: a dual-tasking paradigm
- PMID: 25999903
- PMCID: PMC4423307
- DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00596
Measuring the cognitive resources consumed per second for real-time lie-production and recollection: a dual-tasking paradigm
Abstract
This research report presents a novel method of dual-tasking lie-detection. Novel software "Follow Me" was invented for a concurrent eye-hand coordination task during truth-telling/lying. Undergraduate participants were instructed to tell truths on questions about undergraduate school whereas they were instructed to tell lies on interview questions about graduate school, pretending they were graduate students. Throughout the experiment, they operated the "Follow Me" software: moving the mouse pointer to follow a randomly-moving dot on a computer screen. The distance between the mouse pointer tip and the dot center was measured by the software every 50 ms. Frequency of distance fluctuation was analyzed as the index of cognitive effort consumed per second (i.e., "degree of cognitive effort"). The results revealed that the dominant frequency of distance fluctuation was significantly lower during encoding than during retrieving responses; and lower during lying than truth-telling. Thus, dominant frequency of distance fluctuation may be an effective index of cognitive effort. Moreover, both encoding and retrieving bald-faced lies were more cognitively effortful than truth-telling. This novel definition and measurement of degree of cognitive effort may contribute to the research field of deception as well as to many other fields in social cognition.
Keywords: cognitive effort; dual-tasking; eye-hand coordination; lie-detection; lying.
Figures
Similar articles
-
An empirical test of the decision to lie component of the Activation-Decision-Construction-Action Theory (ADCAT).Acta Psychol (Amst). 2016 Sep;169:45-55. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2016.05.004. Epub 2016 May 22. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2016. PMID: 27219533
-
Let the man choose what to do: Neural correlates of spontaneous lying and truth-telling.Brain Cogn. 2016 Feb;102:13-25. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2015.11.007. Epub 2015 Dec 10. Brain Cogn. 2016. PMID: 26685089
-
Psychopathic Traits and Their Relationship with the Cognitive Costs and Compulsive Nature of Lying in Offenders.PLoS One. 2016 Jul 8;11(7):e0158595. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158595. eCollection 2016. PLoS One. 2016. PMID: 27391854 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Lying takes time: A meta-analysis on reaction time measures of deception.Psychol Bull. 2017 Apr;143(4):428-453. doi: 10.1037/bul0000087. Epub 2017 Feb 9. Psychol Bull. 2017. PMID: 28182460 Review.
-
When is Deceptive Message Production More Effortful than Truth-Telling? A Baker's Dozen of Moderators.Front Psychol. 2015 Dec 24;6:1965. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01965. eCollection 2015. Front Psychol. 2015. PMID: 26733932 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Detecting simulated versus bona fide traumatic brain injury using pupillometry.Neuropsychology. 2021 Jul;35(5):472-485. doi: 10.1037/neu0000747. Epub 2021 May 20. Neuropsychology. 2021. PMID: 34014751 Free PMC article.
-
Detecting feigned cognitive impairment using pupillometry on the Warrington Recognition Memory Test for Words.J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2024 Feb;46(1):36-45. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2024.2312624. Epub 2024 Feb 25. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2024. PMID: 38402625 Free PMC article.
References
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources