Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015:2015:827416.
doi: 10.1155/2015/827416. Epub 2015 Apr 27.

Rapid identification of pathogens in positive blood culture of patients with sepsis: review and meta-analysis of the performance of the sepsityper kit

Affiliations
Review

Rapid identification of pathogens in positive blood culture of patients with sepsis: review and meta-analysis of the performance of the sepsityper kit

Nils G Morgenthaler et al. Int J Microbiol. 2015.

Abstract

Sepsis is one of the leading causes of deaths, and rapid identification (ID) of blood stream infection is mandatory to perform adequate antibiotic therapy. The advent of MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry for the rapid ID of pathogens was a major breakthrough in microbiology. Recently, this method was combined with extraction methods for pathogens directly from positive blood cultures. This review summarizes the results obtained so far with the commercial Sepsityper sample preparation kit, which is now approved for in vitro diagnostic use. Summarizing data from 21 reports, the Sepsityper kit allowed a reliable ID on the species level of 80% of 3320 positive blood culture bottles. Gram negative bacteria resulted consistently in higher ID rates (90%) compared to Gram positive bacteria (76%) or yeast (66%). No relevant misidentifications on the genus level were reported at a log(score)cut-off of 1.6. The Sepsityper kit is a simple and reproducible method which extends the MALDI-TOF technology to positive blood culture specimens and shortens the time to result by several hours or even days. In combination with antibiotic stewardship programs, this rapid ID allows a much faster optimization of antibiotic therapy in patients with sepsis compared to conventional workflows.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Adhikari N. K. J., Fowler R. A., Bhagwanjee S., Rubenfeld G. D. Critical care and the global burden of critical illness in adults. The Lancet. 2010;376(9749):1339–1346. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(10)60446-1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Angus D. C., van der Poll T. Severe sepsis and septic shock. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2013;369(21):p. 2063. - PubMed
    1. Dellinger R. P., Levy M. M., Rhodes A., et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock, 2012. Intensive Care Medicine. 2013;39(2):165–228. doi: 10.1007/s00134-012-2769-8. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kumar A., Roberts D., Wood K. E., et al. Duration of hypotension before initiation of effective antimicrobial therapy is the critical determinant of survival in human septic shock. Critical Care Medicine. 2006;34(6):1589–1596. doi: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000217961.75225.e9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lynch J. P., Clark N. M., Zhanel G. G. Evolution of antimicrobial resistance among Enterobacteriaceae (focus on extended spectrum β-lactamases and carbapenemases) Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy. 2013;14(2):199–210. doi: 10.1517/14656566.2013.763030. - DOI - PubMed