Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Mar 29;5(1):34-41.
doi: 10.15171/hpp.2015.005. eCollection 2015.

Stroke education in an emergency department waiting room: a comparison of methods

Affiliations

Stroke education in an emergency department waiting room: a comparison of methods

Yu-Feng Yvonne Chan et al. Health Promot Perspect. .

Abstract

Background: Since the emergency department (ED) waiting room hosts a large, captive audience of patients and visitors, it may be an ideal location for conducting focused stroke education. The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of various stroke education methods.

Methods: Patients and visitors of an urban ED waiting room were randomized into one of the following groups: video, brochure, one-to-one teaching, combination of these three methods, or control group. We administered a 13-question multiple-choice test to assess stroke knowledge prior to, immediately after, and at 1 month post-education to patients and visitors in the ED waiting room.

Results: Of 4 groups receiving education, all significantly improved their test scores immediately post intervention (test scores 9.4±2.5-10.3±2.0, P<0.01). At 1 month, the combination group retained the most knowledge (9.4±2.4) exceeding pre-intervention and control scores (both 6.7±2.6, P<0.01).

Conclusion: Among the various stroke education methods delivered in the ED waiting room, the combination method resulted in the highest knowledge retention at 1-month post intervention.

Keywords: Emergency Department; Patient education; Stroke education.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1

References

    1. Kothari R, Sauerbeck L, Jauch E, Broderick J, Brott T, Khoury J. et al. Patient's awareness of stroke signs, symptoms, and risk factors. Stroke. 1997;28:1871–1875. doi: 10.1161/01.str.28.10.1871.. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pancioli AM, Broderick J, Kothari R, Brott T, Tuchfarber A, Miller R. et al. Public perception of stroke warning signs and potential risk factors. JAMA . 1998;279:1288–1292. doi: 10.1001/jama.279.16.1288. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Williams LS, Bruno A, Rouch D, Marriott DJ. Stroke patients’ knowledge of stroke: influence on time to presentation. Stroke. 1997;28:912–915. doi: 10.1161/01.str.28.5.912.. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Samsa GP, Cohen SJ, Goldstein LB, Bonito AJ, Duncan PW, Enarson C. et al. Knowledge of stroke risk among patients at increased risk for stroke. Stroke . 1997;28:916–921. doi: 10.1161/01.str.28.5.916. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sacco RL, Boden-Albala B, Gan R, Chen X, Kargman DE, Shea S. et al. Stroke incidence among white, black, and Hispanic residents of an urban community: The Northern Manhattan stroke study. Am J Epidemiol . 1998;147:259–268. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009445. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources