Asymmetric Mating Interference between Two Related Mosquito Species: Aedes (Stegomyia) albopictus and Aedes (Stegomyia) cretinus
- PMID: 26001099
- PMCID: PMC4441505
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0127762
Asymmetric Mating Interference between Two Related Mosquito Species: Aedes (Stegomyia) albopictus and Aedes (Stegomyia) cretinus
Erratum in
-
Correction: Asymmetric Mating Interference between Two Related Mosquito Species: Aedes (Stegomyia) albopictus and Aedes (Stegomyia) cretinus.PLoS One. 2015 Jul 6;10(7):e0132862. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0132862. eCollection 2015. PLoS One. 2015. PMID: 26147374 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Abstract
Aedes (Stegomyia) albopictus (Skuse) and Aedes (Stegomyia) cretinus Edwards are closely related mosquito species with common morphological features and bio-ecological similarities. Recent mosquito surveillance in Athens, Greece, showed that they are sympatric mosquito species, with Ae. albopictus [corrected] developing quite higher population densities than Ae. cretinus [corrected] . The potential of mating interference between these species was investigated by reciprocal and homologous mating experiments in cages under laboratory conditions. In non-choice interspecific crosses (groups of males and females) females of both species produced sterile eggs. Insemination rate was 58% for Ae. cretinus females and only 1% for Ae. albopictus [corrected] females. Aedes albopictus males were sexually aggressive and inseminated Ae. cretinus females (31%) in choice experiments, where males of one species had access to mate with females of both species. Whereas, interspecific mating of Ae. albopictus [corrected] females with Ae. cretinus males in the co-occurrence of Ae. cretinus females was weaker (4%). Aedes cretinus females from non-choice crossing with Ae. albopictus [corrected] or Ae. cretinus males were paired individually with conspecific males. The percentage of fertile Ae. cretinus females was 17.5% when had encaged before with Ae. albopictus [corrected] males, compared to 100% when Ae. cretinus [corrected] females were encaged with conspecific males only. Probable ecological consequences of asymmetric mating between these ecologically homologous species in nature are discussed.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures


Similar articles
-
Laboratory study on larval competition between two related mosquito species: Aedes (Stegomyia) albopictus and Aedes (Stegomyia) cretinus.Acta Trop. 2022 Jun;230:106389. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2022.106389. Epub 2022 Mar 8. Acta Trop. 2022. PMID: 35276061
-
Cross-mating between Malaysian strains of Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus in the laboratory.Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2009 Jan;40(1):40-6. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2009. PMID: 19323032
-
Asymmetrical reproductive interference between Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus : Implications for coexistence.J Vector Borne Dis. 2024 Oct-Dec 01;61(4):547-554. doi: 10.4103/JVBD.jvbd_40_24. Epub 2024 Nov 26. J Vector Borne Dis. 2024. PMID: 38965875
-
Satyrization and satyrization-resistance in competitive displacements of invasive mosquito species.Insect Sci. 2016 Apr;23(2):162-74. doi: 10.1111/1744-7917.12291. Epub 2016 Jan 18. Insect Sci. 2016. PMID: 26542083 Review.
-
The Importance of Interspecific Interactions on the Present Range of the Invasive Mosquito Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) and Persistence of Resident Container Species in the United States.J Med Entomol. 2016 Sep;53(5):992-1001. doi: 10.1093/jme/tjw095. Epub 2016 Jun 28. J Med Entomol. 2016. PMID: 27354436 Review.
Cited by
-
Correction: Asymmetric Mating Interference between Two Related Mosquito Species: Aedes (Stegomyia) albopictus and Aedes (Stegomyia) cretinus.PLoS One. 2015 Jul 6;10(7):e0132862. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0132862. eCollection 2015. PLoS One. 2015. PMID: 26147374 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Comparative population genetics of the invasive mosquito Aedes albopictus and the native mosquito Aedes flavopictus in the Korean peninsula.Parasit Vectors. 2021 Jul 27;14(1):377. doi: 10.1186/s13071-021-04873-5. Parasit Vectors. 2021. PMID: 34315478 Free PMC article.
-
Imported Chikungunya fever case in Greece in June 2014 and public health response.Pathog Glob Health. 2016 Mar;110(2):68-73. doi: 10.1080/20477724.2016.1176311. Epub 2016 May 9. Pathog Glob Health. 2016. PMID: 27159571 Free PMC article.
-
Neurobiology and Changing Ecosystems: Mechanisms Underlying Responses to Human-Generated Environmental Impacts.J Neurosci. 2023 Nov 8;43(45):7530-7537. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1431-23.2023. J Neurosci. 2023. PMID: 37940589 Free PMC article.
-
Bioassay and molecular monitoring of insecticide resistance status in Aedes albopictus populations from Greece, to support evidence-based vector control.Parasit Vectors. 2020 Jun 29;13(1):328. doi: 10.1186/s13071-020-04204-0. Parasit Vectors. 2020. PMID: 32600453 Free PMC article.
References
-
- DeBach P (1966) The competitive displacement and coexistence principles. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 11: 183–212.
-
- Reitz S, Trumble J (2002) Competitive displacement among insects and arachnids. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 47: 435–465. - PubMed
-
- Mack RN, Simberloff D, Lonsdale WM, Evans H, Clout M, Bazzaz F (2000) Biotic invasions: Causes, epidemiology, global consequences, and control. Ecol. Appl. 10: 689–710.
-
- Ribeiro J, Spielman A (1986) The satyr effect: a model predicting parapatry and species extinction. Amer. Nat. 128: 513–528.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources