Metrics for Original Research Articles in the AJR: From First Submission to Final Publication
- PMID: 26001223
- DOI: 10.2214/AJR.14.13944
Metrics for Original Research Articles in the AJR: From First Submission to Final Publication
Abstract
Objective: The objective of our study was to evaluate manuscript metrics pertaining to AJR submissions, assessing the pathway from manuscript submission to publication, including the reviewer allocation time, decisions rendered, timing of decisions rendered, and time to publication.
Materials and methods: Six hundred ninety-six unsolicited Original Research manuscripts submitted to the AJR between July 1, 2012, and December 21, 2012, were included in this retrospective analysis. Metrics pertaining to manuscripts' decision status and associated timelines were extracted by journal editorial staff and assessed using standard summary statistics.
Results: For new submissions, decisions rendered were as follows: Accept, 0.3%; Minor Revision, 8.5%; Major Revision, 19.7%; Reject, 65.1%; and Reject Without Review, 6.5%. For first and second resubmissions, 40.0-55.2% of manuscripts representing a Major Revision and 91.5-94.7% of manuscripts representing a Minor Revision were accepted; 100% of manuscripts undergoing a third resubmission were accepted; 98.3% and 84.7% of manuscripts receiving at first submission a decision of Minor Revision and Major Revision, respectively, ultimately achieved acceptance. The time (mean ± SD) to review a new submission was 30.5 ± 43.1 days (Accept), 42.7 ± 27.4 days (Minor Revision), 39.4 ± 17.6 days (Major Revision), and 40.2 ± 20.3 days (Reject) and decreased with each subsequent resubmission to 6.3 ± 6.3 days (Accept) for third resubmissions. The mean days for authors to submit a first resubmission was 21.1 ± 15.3 days (Minor Revision) and 73.7 ± 65.1 days (Major Revision) and decreased with each subsequent resubmission to 9.8 ± 11.3 days (Minor Revision) and 27.0 ± 0.0 days (Major Revision) for third resubmissions. The mean time from acceptance to publication was 242.5 ± 47.5 days.
Conclusion: The observed metrics may provide valuable insights for authors and for AJR editorial staff in ongoing efforts to shorten turnaround times from manuscript submission to publication.
Keywords: journalism; publication; radiology research.
Similar articles
-
Analysis of the Revision Process by American Journal of Roentgenology Reviewers and Section Editors: Metrics of Rejected Manuscripts and Their Final Disposition.AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 Jun;208(6):1181-1184. doi: 10.2214/AJR.16.17631. Epub 2017 Mar 28. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017. PMID: 28350482
-
Does online submission of manuscripts improve efficiency?JBR-BTR. 2008 Nov-Dec;91(6):231-4. JBR-BTR. 2008. PMID: 19202995
-
Peer-review and editorial process of the Ethiopian Medical Journal: ten years assessment of the status of submitted manuscripts.Ethiop Med J. 2013 Apr;51(2):95-103. Ethiop Med J. 2013. PMID: 24079153
-
Peer Review Process, Editorial Decisions, and Manuscript Resubmission: A Reference for Novice Researchers.J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2015 Sep;115(9):566-9. doi: 10.7556/jaoa.2015.114. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2015. PMID: 26322935 Review. No abstract available.
-
An author's guide to submission, revision and rejection.Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2015 Nov;97(8):546-8. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2015.0046. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2015. PMID: 26492899 Free PMC article. Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources