Assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction using low radiation dose computed tomography
- PMID: 26002814
- DOI: 10.1007/s12350-015-0123-6
Assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction using low radiation dose computed tomography
Erratum in
-
Erratum to: Assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction using low radiation dose computed tomography.J Nucl Cardiol. 2016 Jun;23(3):422. doi: 10.1007/s12350-015-0211-7. J Nucl Cardiol. 2016. PMID: 26092631 No abstract available.
Abstract
Background: Cardiac CT is a non-invasive modality with the ability to estimate LVEF. However, given its limited temporal resolution and radiation, there has been initial resistance to use CT to measure LVEF. Developing an accurate, fast, low radiation dose protocol is desirable.
Objective: The objective of this study is to demonstrate that a 'low radiation dose' 64 slice cardiac computed tomography (CT) protocol is feasible and can accurately measure left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) while delivering a radiation dose lower than radionuclide angiography (RNA).
Methods: Patients undergoing RNA were prospectively screened and enrolled to undergo a 'low-dose' 64 slice CT LVEF protocol. LVEF measures, duration of each study and radiation dose between CT and RNA were compared.
Results: A total of 77 patients (mean age = 61.8 ± 12.2 years and 58 men) were analyzed. The mean LVEF measured by CT and RNA were 41.9 ± 15.2% and 39.4 ± 13.9%, respectively, (P = 0.154) with a good correlation (r = 0.863). Bland-Altman plot revealed a good agreement between the CT and RNA LVEF (mean difference of -2.4). There was good agreement between CT LVEF and RNA for identifying patients with LVEF ≤30% (kappa = 0.693) and LVEF ≥50% (kappa = 0.749). The mean dose estimated effective dose for CT and RNA were 4.7 ± 1.6 and 9.5 ± 1.0 mSv, respectively. The mean CT LVEF imaging duration (4:32 ± 3:05 minutes) was significantly shorter than the RNA image acquisition time (9:05 ± 2:36 minutes; p < 0.001).
Conclusion: The results of our study suggest that low-dose CT LVEF protocol is feasible, accurate, and fast while delivering a lower radiation dose than traditional RNA.
Keywords: Computed tomography; ejection fraction; radionuclide angiography.
Comment in
-
Approaches to measuring ejection fraction: Many tools, but how to decide which one?J Nucl Cardiol. 2016 Jun;23(3):423-4. doi: 10.1007/s12350-015-0183-7. Epub 2015 Jun 2. J Nucl Cardiol. 2016. PMID: 26031495 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Dual-source CT with improved temporal resolution in assessment of left ventricular function: a pilot study.AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007 Nov;189(5):1064-70. doi: 10.2214/AJR.07.2228. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007. PMID: 17954641
-
Ejection fractions determined by cardiac computed tomographic angiography and single photon emission computed tomographic myocardial perfusion imaging are not interchangeable: evidence of significant and sex-associated disparities.J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2009 Jul-Aug;33(4):489-97. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e3181a1c820. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2009. PMID: 19638838
-
Assessment of left ventricular regional wall motion and ejection fraction with low-radiation dose helical dual-source CT: comparison to two-dimensional echocardiography.J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2011 May-Jun;5(3):149-57. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2011.01.011. Epub 2011 Jan 28. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2011. PMID: 21367686
-
Analysis of ventricular function by CT.J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2015 Jan-Feb;9(1):1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2014.11.007. Epub 2014 Nov 26. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2015. PMID: 25576407 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Optimal use of AEC in CT: a literature review.Radiol Technol. 2010 Mar-Apr;81(4):309-17. Radiol Technol. 2010. PMID: 20207787 Review.
Cited by
-
Sex Differences in Associations of Arterial Compliance With Coronary Artery Plaque and Calcification Burden.J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Aug 19;6(8):e006079. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.006079. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017. PMID: 28862955 Free PMC article.
-
Approaches to measuring ejection fraction: Many tools, but how to decide which one?J Nucl Cardiol. 2016 Jun;23(3):423-4. doi: 10.1007/s12350-015-0183-7. Epub 2015 Jun 2. J Nucl Cardiol. 2016. PMID: 26031495 No abstract available.
-
Review of Cardiovascular Imaging in the Journal of Nuclear Cardiology in 2016. Part 1 of 2: Positron Emission Tomography, Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance.J Nucl Cardiol. 2017 Apr;24(2):649-656. doi: 10.1007/s12350-017-0820-4. Epub 2017 Feb 13. J Nucl Cardiol. 2017. PMID: 28194727 Review.
-
Role of cardiovascular imaging in selection of donor hearts.World J Transplant. 2015 Dec 24;5(4):348-53. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v5.i4.348. World J Transplant. 2015. PMID: 26722663 Free PMC article.
-
Emerging Challenges of Radiation-Associated Cardiovascular Dysfunction (RACVD) in Modern Radiation Oncology: Clinical Practice, Bench Investigation, and Multidisciplinary Care.Front Cardiovasc Med. 2020 Feb 21;7:16. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2020.00016. eCollection 2020. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2020. PMID: 32154267 Free PMC article. Review.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical