Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2015 Sep;213(3):417.e1-7.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.031. Epub 2015 May 21.

Blood pressure evaluation in children treated with laser surgery for twin-twin transfusion syndrome at 2-year follow-up

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Blood pressure evaluation in children treated with laser surgery for twin-twin transfusion syndrome at 2-year follow-up

Jay D Pruetz et al. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Sep.

Abstract

Objective: Twin survivors of twin-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS) may be at risk for early onset of cardiovascular disease. The aim of this study was to determine prevalence and risk factors for elevated blood pressure (BP) among children treated with selective laser photocoagulation of communicating vessels.

Study design: Data were prospectively collected from surviving children treated for TTTS with laser surgery from 2008 through 2010. Systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) were obtained from 91 child survivors at age 24 months (±6 weeks) and evaluated based on age, sex, and height percentile. BP percentiles were calculated for each patient and categorized as normal (<95%) or abnormal (>95%). Clinical variables were evaluated using multilevel regression models to evaluate risk factors for elevated BP.

Results: BP was categorized as normal in 38% and abnormal in 62% of twin survivors based on percentile for sex, age, and height; a comparable distribution was found for DBP elevation. There were no differences between donor and recipient twins for absolute SBP and DBP or BP classification. In a multivariate analysis, significant risk factors for higher SBP included prematurity (β -0.54; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.99 to -0.09; P = .02), higher weight percentile (β 0.24; 95% CI, 0.05-0.42; P = .01), and presence of cardiac disease (β 0.50; 95% CI, 0.10-0.89; P = .01). Prematurity was also a significant risk for abnormal DBP (odds ratio, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.80-1.00; P = .05).

Conclusion: Child survivors of TTTS had elevated SBP and DBP measurements at 2 years of age, with no differences seen between former donor and recipient twins. Prematurity may be a risk factor for elevated BP measurements in this population. Future studies are warranted to ascertain whether these cardiovascular findings persist over time.

Keywords: cardiovascular disease; elevated blood pressure; fetal interventions; fetal physiology; twin-twin transfusion syndrome.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Duncan KR, Denbow ML, Fisk NM. The aetiology and management of twin-twin transfusion syndrome. Prenat Diagn. 1997;17:1227–1236. - PubMed
    1. Karatza AA, Wolfenden JL, Taylor MJ, Wee L, Fisk NM, Gardiner HM. Influence of twin-twin transfusion syndrome on fetal cardiovascular structure and function: prospective case-control study of 136 monochorionic twin pregnancies. Heart. 2002;88:271–277. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dickinson JE, Evans SF. Obstetric and perinatal outcomes from the australian and new zealand twin-twin transfusion syndrome registry. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;182:706–712. - PubMed
    1. Fesslova V, Villa L, Nava S, Mosca F, Nicolini U. Fetal and neonatal echocardiographic findings in twin-twin transfusion syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998;179:1056–1062. - PubMed
    1. Rychik J, Zeng S, Bebbington M, et al. Speckle tracking-derived myocardial tissue deformation imaging in twin-twin transfusion syndrome: differences in strain and strain rate between donor and recipient twins. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2012;32:131–137. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms