Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015 Dec;25(12):3629-37.
doi: 10.1007/s00330-015-3770-8. Epub 2015 May 24.

Cost-effectiveness modelling in diagnostic imaging: a stepwise approach

Affiliations
Review

Cost-effectiveness modelling in diagnostic imaging: a stepwise approach

Anna M Sailer et al. Eur Radiol. 2015 Dec.

Abstract

Diagnostic imaging (DI) is the fastest growing sector in medical expenditures and takes a central role in medical decision-making. The increasing number of various and new imaging technologies induces a growing demand for cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) in imaging technology assessment. In this article we provide a comprehensive framework of direct and indirect effects that should be considered for CEA in DI, suitable for all imaging modalities. We describe and explain the methodology of decision analytic modelling in six steps aiming to transfer theory of CEA to clinical research by demonstrating key principles of CEA in a practical approach. We thereby provide radiologists with an introduction to the tools necessary to perform and interpret CEA as part of their research and clinical practice.

Key points: • DI influences medical decision making, affecting both costs and health outcome. • This article provides a comprehensive framework for CEA in DI. • A six-step methodology for conducting and interpreting cost-effectiveness modelling is proposed.

Keywords: Cost Effectiveness; Decision Modelling; Diagnostic Imaging; Economics; Technology Assessment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Comprehensive framework of cost-effectiveness analysis in diagnostic imaging
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Schematic example of a decision tree model
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Schematic example of a Markov model
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Cost-effectiveness graph. QALY: Quality adjusted live years. ICER: Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Schematic example of cost-effectiveness acceptability curves (CEACs). The probability of cost-effectiveness of three investigated imaging tests is plotted against the willingness to pay for a quality adjusted life year (QALY) [6]

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Drummond MF, Sculpher MJ, Torrance GW, O’Brien BJ, Stoddart GL. Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes. 3. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2005.
    1. Husereau D, Drummond M, Petrou S, et al. Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2013;29:117–122. doi: 10.1017/S0266462313000160. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Neiman Institute (2012) Medical Imaging: Is the growth boom over? In: Neiman Report Brief 1. Neiman Institute
    1. Hillman BJ, Goldsmith JC. The uncritical use of high-tech medical imaging. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:4–6. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1003173. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schaafsma JD, Koffijberg H, Buskens E, Velthuis BK, van der Graaf Y, Rinkel GJ. Cost-effectiveness of magnetic resonance angiography versus intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography to follow-up patients with coiled intracranial aneurysms. Stroke. 2010;41:1736–1742. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.585083. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources