Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Apr 1;99(Pt A):113-128.
doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2015.05.009. Epub 2015 May 22.

Progress and problems with the use of suicide genes for targeted cancer therapy

Affiliations
Review

Progress and problems with the use of suicide genes for targeted cancer therapy

Zahra Karjoo et al. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. .

Abstract

Among various gene therapy methods for cancer, suicide gene therapy attracts a special attention because it allows selective conversion of non-toxic compounds into cytotoxic drugs inside cancer cells. As a result, therapeutic index can be increased significantly by introducing high concentrations of cytotoxic molecules to the tumor environment while minimizing impact on normal tissues. Despite significant success at the preclinical level, no cancer suicide gene therapy protocol has delivered the desirable clinical significance yet. This review gives a critical look at the six main enzyme/prodrug systems that are used in suicide gene therapy of cancer and familiarizes readers with the state-of-the-art research and practices in this field. For each enzyme/prodrug system, the mechanisms of action, protein engineering strategies to enhance enzyme stability/affinity and chemical modification techniques to increase prodrug kinetics and potency are discussed. In each category, major clinical trials that have been performed in the past decade with each enzyme/prodrug system are discussed to highlight the progress to date. Finally, shortcomings are underlined and areas that need improvement in order to produce clinical significance are delineated.

Keywords: Bystander effect; Cancer Gene therapy; Cytosine deaminase; Enzyme prodrug; GDEPT; Ganciclovir; Nitroreductase; Thymidine kinase.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic representation of the two step process in suicide gene therapy. In step 1, with the help of a vector the cancer cells are transduced by suicide genes resulting in expression of an enzyme. In step 2, prodrug is administered which can be converted into its cytotoxic form by the enzyme and kill not only the transduced cells but also the neighboring ones.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Mechanism of action for ganciclovir (GCV). HSVTK phosphorylates thymidine to thymidine monophosphate (thymidine-MP) which undergoes more phosphopylation steps by cell endogenous kinases. The final product, thymidine triphosphate (thymidine-TP) is one of the building blocks of DNA structure. GCV competes with thymidine and gets phosphorylated to ganciclovir-MP first and then ganciclovir-TP. Ganciclovir-TP blocks DNA elongation by inhibiting DNA polymerase.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Deamination of 5-FC by cytosine deaminase (CD). The product, 5-FU is converted to 5-FUMP and eventually 5-FUTP which blocks RNA synthesis. Other byproducts such as 5-FdUMP and 5-FdUTP block DNA synthesis after incorporation into DNA structure.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Activation of CB1954 by bacterial nitroreductase. After activation, both 4-hydroxylamine and 2-hydroxylamine metabolites cause DNA damage.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Activation of CMDA and ZD2767P to their toxic metabolites by bacterial carboxypeptidase G2 (CPG2).
Figure 6
Figure 6
The two-step process which produces the toxic metabolites, phosphoramide mustard and acrolein from cyclophosphamide. CYP enzyme super family catalyzes the first step whereas the second step is a self-immolative reaction.
Figure 7
Figure 7
The conversion of 6-methylpurine deoxyriboside to 6 -methylpurine by bacterial purine nucleoside phosphorylase.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Baban DF, Seymour LW. Control of tumour vascular permeability. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 1998;34:109–119. - PubMed
    1. Kobayashi H, Watanabe R, Choyke PL. Improving conventional enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effects; what is the appropriate target? Theranostics. 2013;4:81–89. - PMC - PubMed
    1. DeVita VT, Chu E. A History of Cancer Chemotherapy. Cancer Res. 2008;68:8643–8653. - PubMed
    1. Vandyke K, Fitter S, Dewar AL, Hughes TP, Zannettino AC. Dysregulation of bone remodeling by imatinib mesylate. Blood. 2010;115:766–774. - PubMed
    1. Zhou Y, Kopecek J. Biological rationale for the design of polymeric anti-cancer nanomedicines. J Drug Target. 2013;21:1–26. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types