C5 Nerve root palsies following cervical spine surgery: A review
- PMID: 26005577
- PMCID: PMC4431054
- DOI: 10.4103/2152-7806.156556
C5 Nerve root palsies following cervical spine surgery: A review
Abstract
Background: Cervical C5 nerve root palsies may occur in between 0% and 30% of routine anterior or posterior cervical spine operations. They are largely attributed to traction injuries/increased cord migration following anterior/posterior decompressions. Of interest, almost all studies cite spontaneous resolution of these deficits without surgery with 3-24 postoperative months.
Methods: Different studies cite various frequencies for C5 root palsies following anterior or posterior cervical spine surgery. In their combined anterior/posterior series involving C4-C5 level decompressions, Libelski et al. cited up to a 12% incidence of C5 palsies. In Gu et al. series, C5 root palsies occurred in 3.1% of double-door laminoplasty, 4.5% of open-door laminoplasty, and 11.3% of laminectomy. Miller et al. observed an intermediate 6.9% frequency of C5 palsies followed by posterior cervical decompressions and fusions (PCDF).
Results: Gu et al. also identified multiple risk factors for developing C5 palsies following posterior surgery; male gender, ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL), narrower foramina, laminectomy, and marked dorsal spinal cord drift. Miller et al. also identified an average $1918 increased cost for physical/occupational therapy for patients with C5 palsies.
Conclusions: The incidence of C5 root deficits for anterior/posterior cervical surgery at C4-C5 was 12% in one series, and ranged up to 11.3% for laminectomies, while others cited 0-30%. Although identification of preoperative risk factors for C5 root deficits may help educate patients regarding these risks, there is no clear method for their avoidance at this time.
Keywords: Anterior surgery; C4-C5 surgery; C5 root palsies; cervical; factors; posterior surgery; risk.
Similar articles
-
C6 nerve root palsy after double-door cervical laminoplasty.Surg Neurol Int. 2021 Oct 6;12:502. doi: 10.25259/SNI_870_2021. eCollection 2021. Surg Neurol Int. 2021. PMID: 34754552 Free PMC article.
-
Palsy of the C5 nerve root after midsagittal-splitting laminoplasty of the cervical spine.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Jun 1;28(11):1123-7. doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000067261.83984.73. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003. PMID: 12782979
-
Biomechanical Effects on Cervical Spinal Cord and Nerve Root Following Laminoplasty for Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament in the Cervical Spine: A Comparison Between Open-Door and Double-Door Laminoplasty Using Finite Element Analysis.J Biomech Eng. 2018 Jul 1;140(7). doi: 10.1115/1.4039826. J Biomech Eng. 2018. PMID: 29677281
-
[The dorsal approach in degeneratively changed cervical spine].Orthopade. 1996 Nov;25(6):533-41. doi: 10.1007/s001320050057. Orthopade. 1996. PMID: 8999408 Review. German.
-
C5 nerve root palsy following decompression of cervical spine with anterior versus posterior types of procedures in patients with cervical myelopathy.Eur Spine J. 2016 Jul;25(7):2050-9. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4567-4. Epub 2016 Apr 19. Eur Spine J. 2016. PMID: 27095700 Review.
Cited by
-
In the right patient, likely fewer risks with posterior versus anterior cervical spine surgery: Perspective/short review.Surg Neurol Int. 2025 Mar 21;16:92. doi: 10.25259/SNI_154_2025. eCollection 2025. Surg Neurol Int. 2025. PMID: 40206749 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Radiological and clinical outcomes of cervical disc arthroplasty for the elderly: a comparison with young patients.BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019 Mar 18;20(1):115. doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-2509-0. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019. PMID: 30885198 Free PMC article.
-
Cervical Laminectomy with Lateral Mass Screw Fixation in Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: Neurological and Sagittal Alignment Outcome: Do We Need Lateral Mass Screws at each Segment?Indian J Orthop. 2017 Nov-Dec;51(6):658-665. doi: 10.4103/ortho.IJOrtho_266_16. Indian J Orthop. 2017. PMID: 29200481 Free PMC article.
-
C5 nerve palsy after posterior reconstruction surgery: predictive risk factors of the incidence and critical range of correction for kyphosis.Eur Spine J. 2016 Jul;25(7):2060-7. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4548-7. Epub 2016 Apr 7. Eur Spine J. 2016. PMID: 27055443
-
Neuromonitoring in Cervical Spine Surgery: When Is a Signal Drop Clinically Significant?Asian Spine J. 2021 Jun;15(3):317-323. doi: 10.31616/asj.2020.0074. Epub 2020 Dec 2. Asian Spine J. 2021. PMID: 33260284 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Chang PY, Chan RC, Tsai YA, Huang WC, Cheng H, Wang JC, et al. Quantitative measures of functional outcomes and quality of life in patients with C5 palsy. J Chin Med Assoc. 2013;76:378–84. - PubMed
-
- Chen Y, Chen D, Wang X, Yang H, Liu X, Miao J, et al. Significance of segmental instability in cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament and treated by a posterior hybrid technique. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2013;133:171–7. - PubMed
-
- Currier BL. Neurological complications of cervical spine surgery: C5 palsy and intraoperative monitoring. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2012;37:E328–34. - PubMed
-
- Du W, Zhang P, Shen Y, Zhang YZ, Ding WY, Ren LX. Enlarged laminectomy and lateral mass screw fixation for multilevel cervical degenerative myelopathy associated with kyphosis. Spine J. 2014;14:57–64. - PubMed
-
- Eskander MS, Balsis SM, Balinger C, Howard CM, Lewing NW, Eskander JP, et al. The association between preoperative spinal cord rotation and postoperative C5 nerve palsy. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94:1605–9. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous