Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2015 Mar-Apr;41(2):382-7.
doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2015.02.28.

Migration of endotacker into the bladder 7 years after laparoscopic retroperitoneal Burch application

Affiliations
Case Reports

Migration of endotacker into the bladder 7 years after laparoscopic retroperitoneal Burch application

Ahmet Salvarci et al. Int Braz J Urol. 2015 Mar-Apr.

Abstract

Laparoscopy began to be used widely since the second half of 1990s as an alternative to laparotomy or vaginal approaches in incontinence and pelvic diseases in women, based on its claimed better success rates. Injuries were reported in the bladder, gastrointestinal system and the entry of the Verress cannula in early and late laparoscopic applications. De-novo urging, voiding dysfunctions, marked recurrences and surgical inefficiencies were observed in 5-year follow-ups after laparoscopic incontinence surgery. Although tension-free midurethral sling operations replaced open laparoscopic colposuspensions nowadays, laparoscopic colposuspension is still preferred in cases where simultaneous laparoscopic paravaginal repair or sacrocolpopexy is considered or where synthetic graft implantation is contraindicated. Moreover, meshes and endotackers are still frequently used in many laparoscopic applications in various clinics. The migration of the tacker used in mesh fixation in a patient where retroperitoneal laparoscopic Burch was performed 7 years ago due to stress urinary incontinence and the extraction of the ossified tacker from the bladder will be presented.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

CONFLICT OF INTEREST: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1a
Figure 1a. Ultrasonography image of bladder stone.
Figure 1b
Figure 1b. Tomography (CT) image of endotacker inside the bladder.
Figure 1c
Figure 1c. CT image of normally localized endotackers.
Figure 1d
Figure 1d. CT image of endotacker migrated behind the bladder.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Migrated tacker adhered on the bladder wall at cystoscopy and post-surgery images.

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Guner H, Yildiz A, Erdem A, Erdem M, Tiftik Z, Yildirim M. Surgical treatment of urinary stress incontinence by a suburethral sling procedure using a Mersilene mesh graft. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 1994;37:52–55. - PubMed
    1. Vancaillie TG, Schuessler W. Laparoscopic bladderneck suspension. J Laparoendosc Surg. 1991;1:169–173. - PubMed
    1. Frick AC, Paraiso MF. Laparoscopic management of incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2009;52:390–400. - PubMed
    1. Bulent Tiras M, Sendag F, Dilek U, Guner H. Laparoscopic burch colposuspension: comparison of effectiveness of extraperitoneal and transperitoneal techniques. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2004;116:79–84. - PubMed
    1. Miannay E, Cosson M, Lanvin D, Querleu D, Crepin G. Comparison of open retropubic and laparoscopic colposuspension for treatment of stress urinary incontinence. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1998;79:159–166. - PubMed

Publication types