Biogeochemical Research Priorities for Sustainable Biofuel and Bioenergy Feedstock Production in the Americas
- PMID: 26006220
- DOI: 10.1007/s00267-015-0536-7
Biogeochemical Research Priorities for Sustainable Biofuel and Bioenergy Feedstock Production in the Americas
Abstract
Rapid expansion in biomass production for biofuels and bioenergy in the Americas is increasing demand on the ecosystem resources required to sustain soil and site productivity. We review the current state of knowledge and highlight gaps in research on biogeochemical processes and ecosystem sustainability related to biomass production. Biomass production systems incrementally remove greater quantities of organic matter, which in turn affects soil organic matter and associated carbon and nutrient storage (and hence long-term soil productivity) and off-site impacts. While these consequences have been extensively studied for some crops and sites, the ongoing and impending impacts of biomass removal require management strategies for ensuring that soil properties and functions are sustained for all combinations of crops, soils, sites, climates, and management systems, and that impacts of biomass management (including off-site impacts) are environmentally acceptable. In a changing global environment, knowledge of cumulative impacts will also become increasingly important. Long-term experiments are essential for key crops, soils, and management systems because short-term results do not necessarily reflect long-term impacts, although improved modeling capability may help to predict these impacts. Identification and validation of soil sustainability indicators for both site prescriptions and spatial applications would better inform commercial and policy decisions. In an increasingly inter-related but constrained global context, researchers should engage across inter-disciplinary, inter-agency, and international lines to better ensure the long-term soil productivity across a range of scales, from site to landscape.
Keywords: Agroecosystem; Bioenergy feedstock; Carbon; Forestry; Soil; Sustainability.
Similar articles
-
Bioenergy Development Policy and Practice Must Recognize Potential Hydrologic Impacts: Lessons from the Americas.Environ Manage. 2015 Dec;56(6):1295-314. doi: 10.1007/s00267-015-0460-x. Epub 2015 Mar 27. Environ Manage. 2015. PMID: 25813630
-
Interactions among bioenergy feedstock choices, landscape dynamics, and land use.Ecol Appl. 2011 Jun;21(4):1039-54. doi: 10.1890/09-0501.1. Ecol Appl. 2011. PMID: 21774412
-
Liming impacts on soils, crops and biodiversity in the UK: A review.Sci Total Environ. 2018 Jan 1;610-611:316-332. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.08.020. Epub 2017 Aug 11. Sci Total Environ. 2018. PMID: 28806549 Review.
-
Biofuel intercropping effects on soil carbon and microbial activity.Ecol Appl. 2015 Jan;25(1):140-50. doi: 10.1890/14-0285.1. Ecol Appl. 2015. PMID: 26255363
-
Carbon-based stock feed additives: a research methodology that explores ecologically delivered C biosequestration, alongside live weights, feed use efficiency, soil nutrient retention, and perennial fodder plantations.J Sci Food Agric. 2010 Jan 30;90(2):183-7. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.3818. J Sci Food Agric. 2010. PMID: 20355029 Review.
Cited by
-
Special Issue on Pan American Biofuel and Bioenergy Sustainability.Environ Manage. 2015 Dec;56(6):1273-5. doi: 10.1007/s00267-015-0618-6. Epub 2015 Oct 5. Environ Manage. 2015. PMID: 26438204 No abstract available.
-
Policies for the Sustainable Development of Biofuels in the Pan American Region: A Review and Synthesis of Five Countries.Environ Manage. 2015 Dec;56(6):1276-94. doi: 10.1007/s00267-014-0424-6. Epub 2014 Dec 21. Environ Manage. 2015. PMID: 25526849
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources