Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015 Oct 7;589(20 Pt A):2923-30.
doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2015.05.025. Epub 2015 May 22.

Architectural proteins, transcription, and the three-dimensional organization of the genome

Affiliations
Review

Architectural proteins, transcription, and the three-dimensional organization of the genome

Caelin Cubeñas-Potts et al. FEBS Lett. .

Abstract

Architectural proteins mediate interactions between distant sequences in the genome. Two well-characterized functions of architectural protein interactions include the tethering of enhancers to promoters and bringing together Polycomb-containing sites to facilitate silencing. The nature of which sequences interact genome-wide appears to be determined by the orientation of the architectural protein binding sites as well as the number and identity of architectural proteins present. Ultimately, long range chromatin interactions result in the formation of loops within the chromatin fiber. In this review, we discuss data suggesting that architectural proteins mediate long range chromatin interactions that both facilitate and hinder neighboring interactions, compartmentalizing the genome into regions of highly interacting chromatin domains.

Keywords: CCCTC-binding factor; Chromatin; Epigenetics; Insulator; Topologically associating domain.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1. The consequences of a single architectural protein interaction
Architectural proteins organize regulatory elements within the genome. The facilitating and inhibitory effects of a single architectural protein interaction between two genomic loci are shown. Regulatory elements are shown as gold boxes and architectural proteins are in blue. Facilitating interactions are depicted as green arrows, while insulating interactions are in red. (A) Architectural proteins bound to regulatory elements promote interactions between the regulatory sequences. In addition, polymer simulation studies have suggested that a single architectural protein interaction affects neighboring interactions as well (denoted by *). (B) Regulatory elements within chromatin loops formed by architectural protein interactions may interact more frequently. (C) By reducing the linear genomic distance between loci flanking a chromatin loop, architectural proteins may promote their interactions. (D) Regulatory elements within chromatin loops are insulated from interactions with elements outside the chromatin loops.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2. Multiple architectural protein-bound loci can interact in 3D space
Three distinct architectural-protein bound loci can form multiple different types of interactions and chromatin loops. The mechanisms regulating which architectural protein-bound loci interact are still poorly understood. Architectural proteins are shown in green. (APBS: Architectural protein binding site)
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3. Architectural proteins mark TAD borders
Cartoon schematics depicting regions of highly associating chromatin called TADs, which are separated by TAD borders. Interaction frequency is shown as a continuum from white to dark red. (A) The strength of a TAD border, defined as the ratio between intra- and inter-TAD interactions around border sequences, depends on architectural protein occupancy (occupancy shown by peak size and a continuum from light to dark blue). A specific orientation of the CTCF motif is observed at TAD borders (purple arrows). (B) Individual TADs contain many different chromatin types depicted in green, blue, black and gold. Evidence suggests that TADs represent compartments for regulatory elements. Interacting regulatory elements in the two distinct TADs are shown in purple and cyan.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4. Architectural proteins regulate chromatin interactions within TADs
(A) Cartoon schematic depicting the regions of enriched chromatin interactions within TADs called subTADs. Intra-TAD interactions change during cellular differentiation and are strongly reduced after architectural protein depletion. Interaction frequency is shown as a continuum from white to dark red. (B) Cartoon schematic illustrating how architectural proteins bring distant enhancers and promoters together in 3D space.

References

    1. Pombo A, Dillon N. Three-dimensional genome architecture: players and mechanisms. Nature reviews Molecular cell biology. 2015;16:245–57. - PubMed
    1. Lupiáñez Darío G., Kraft K, Heinrich V, Krawitz P, Brancati F, Klopocki E, Horn D, Kayserili H, Opitz John M., Laxova R, Santos-Simarro F, Gilbert-Dussardier B, Wittler L, Borschiwer M, Haas Stefan A., Osterwalder M, Franke M, Timmermann B, Hecht J, Spielmann M, Visel A, Mundlos S. Disruptions of Topological Chromatin Domains Cause Pathogenic Rewiring of Gene-Enhancer Interactions. Cell - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dixon JR, Selvaraj S, Yue F, Kim A, Li Y, Shen Y, Hu M, Liu JS, Ren B. Topological domains in mammalian genomes identified by analysis of chromatin interactions. Nature. 2012;485:376–80. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lieberman-Aiden E, van Berkum NL, Williams L, Imakaev M, Ragoczy T, Telling A, Amit I, Lajoie BR, Sabo PJ, Dorschner MO, Sandstrom R, Bernstein B, Bender MA, Groudine M, Gnirke A, Stamatoyannopoulos J, Mirny LA, Lander ES, Dekker J. Comprehensive mapping of long-range interactions reveals folding principles of the human genome. Science. 2009;326:289–93. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sexton T, Yaffe E, Kenigsberg E, Bantignies F, Leblanc B, Hoichman M, Parrinello H, Tanay A, Cavalli G. Three-dimensional folding and functional organization principles of the Drosophila genome. Cell. 2012;148:458–72. - PubMed