Economic impact of syndesmosis hardware removal
- PMID: 26008613
- DOI: 10.1016/j.foot.2015.03.001
Economic impact of syndesmosis hardware removal
Abstract
Ankle syndesmosis injuries are commonly seen with 5-10% of sprains and 10% of ankle fractures involving injury to the ankle syndesmosis. Anatomic reduction has been shown to be the most important predictor of clinical outcomes. Optimal surgical management has been a subject of debate in the literature. The method of fixation, number of screws, screw size, and number of cortices are all controversial. Postoperative hardware removal has also been widely debated in the literature. Some surgeons advocate for elective hardware removal prior to resuming full weightbearing. Returning to the operating room for elective hardware removal results in increased cost to the patient, potential for infection or complication(s), and missed work days for the patient. Suture button devices and bioabsorbable screw fixation present other options, but cortical screw fixation remains the gold standard. This retrospective review was designed to evaluate the economic impact of a second operative procedure for elective removal of 3.5mm cortical syndesmosis screws. Two hundred and two patients with ICD-9 code for "open treatment of distal tibiofibular joint (syndesmosis) disruption" were identified. The medical records were reviewed for those who underwent elective syndesmosis hardware removal. The primary outcome measurements included total hospital billing charges and total hospital billing collection. Secondary outcome measurements included average individual patient operative costs and average operating room time. Fifty-six patients were included in the study. Our institution billed a total of $188,271 (USD) and collected $106,284 (55%). The average individual patient operating room cost was $3579. The average operating room time was 67.9 min. To the best of our knowledge, no study has previously provided cost associated with syndesmosis hardware removal. Our study shows elective syndesmosis hardware removal places substantial economic burden on both the patient and the healthcare system.
Keywords: Ankle fracture; Cost analysis; Syndesmosis.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Suture Button Fixation Versus Syndesmotic Screws in Supination-External Rotation Type 4 Injuries: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.Am J Sports Med. 2017 Jan;45(1):210-217. doi: 10.1177/0363546516664713. Epub 2016 Sep 30. Am J Sports Med. 2017. PMID: 27601151
-
Functional and radiographic results of patients with syndesmotic screw fixation: implications for screw removal.J Orthop Trauma. 2010 Jan;24(1):2-6. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181a9f7a5. J Orthop Trauma. 2010. PMID: 20035170
-
Functional outcomes following syndesmotic fixation: A comparison of screws retained in situ versus routine removal - Is it really necessary?Injury. 2013 Dec;44(12):1880-4. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2013.08.011. Epub 2013 Aug 20. Injury. 2013. PMID: 24021584
-
Injuries to the ankle syndesmosis.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014 Apr 2;96(7):603-13. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.M.00094. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014. PMID: 24695928 Review.
-
Distal Tibiofibular Syndesmosis Dysfunction: A Systematic Literature Review of Dynamic Versus Static Fixation Over the Last 10 Years.J Foot Ankle Surg. 2019 Mar;58(2):320-327. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2018.08.050. Epub 2019 Jan 3. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2019. PMID: 30612866
Cited by
-
Non-Union Treatment in the Foot, Ankle, and Lower Leg: A Multicenter Retrospective Study Comparing Conventional Treatment with the Human Allogeneic Cortical Bone Screw (Shark Screw®).J Pers Med. 2024 Mar 27;14(4):352. doi: 10.3390/jpm14040352. J Pers Med. 2024. PMID: 38672979 Free PMC article.
-
Current status of the management of isolated syndesmotic injuries in Germany.Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Apr;143(4):2019-2026. doi: 10.1007/s00402-022-04423-3. Epub 2022 Apr 11. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023. PMID: 35403865 Free PMC article.
-
Tightrope fixation of syndesmotic injuries in Weber C ankle fractures: a multicentre case series.Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2017 May;27(4):461-467. doi: 10.1007/s00590-016-1882-8. Epub 2017 Jan 10. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2017. PMID: 28074301
-
Syndesmosis screw breakage: An analysis of multiple breakage locations.J Orthop. 2022 Jan 22;29:38-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2022.01.004. eCollection 2022 Jan-Feb. J Orthop. 2022. PMID: 35153419 Free PMC article.
-
A systematic review of suture-button versus syndesmotic screw in the treatment of distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injury.BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 Jul 4;18(1):286. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1645-7. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017. PMID: 28676078 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical