Effect of Two- Versus Three-Way Split Resistance Training Routines on Body Composition and Muscular Strength in Bodybuilders: A Pilot Study
- PMID: 26008801
- DOI: 10.1123/ijsnem.2015-0077
Effect of Two- Versus Three-Way Split Resistance Training Routines on Body Composition and Muscular Strength in Bodybuilders: A Pilot Study
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to compare different split resistance training routines on body composition and muscular strength in elite bodybuilders. Ten male bodybuilders (26.7 ± 2.7 years, 85.3 ± 10.4 kg) were randomly assigned into one of two resistance training groups: 4 and 6 times per week (G4× and G6×, respectively), in which the individuals trained for 4 weeks, 4 sets for each exercise performing 6-12 repetitions maximum (RM) in a pyramid fashion. Body composition was assessed by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry, muscle strength was evaluated by 1RM bench-press testing. The food intake was planned by nutritionists and offered individually throughout the duration of the experiment. Significant increases (p < .05) in fat-free mass (G4× = +4.2%, G6× = +3.5%) and muscular strength (G4× = +8.4%, G6× = +11.4%) with no group by time interaction were observed. We conclude that 4 and 6 weekly sessions frequencies of resistance training promote similar increases in fat-free mass and muscular strength in elite bodybuilders.
Similar articles
-
Early-phase adaptations to a split-body, linear periodization resistance training program in college-aged and middle-aged men.J Strength Cond Res. 2009 May;23(3):962-71. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181a00baf. J Strength Cond Res. 2009. PMID: 19387379
-
Effects of Different Weekly Sets-Equated Resistance Training Frequencies on Muscular Strength, Muscle Mass, and Body Fat in Older Women.J Strength Cond Res. 2020 Oct;34(10):2990-2995. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003130. J Strength Cond Res. 2020. PMID: 30908365 Clinical Trial.
-
High-Frequency Resistance Training Is Not More Effective Than Low-Frequency Resistance Training in Increasing Muscle Mass and Strength in Well-Trained Men.J Strength Cond Res. 2019 Jul;33 Suppl 1:S130-S139. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002559. J Strength Cond Res. 2019. PMID: 29489727
-
Recommendations for natural bodybuilding contest preparation: resistance and cardiovascular training.J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2015 Mar;55(3):164-78. Epub 2014 Jul 7. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2015. PMID: 24998610 Review.
-
Evaluation of resistance training to improve muscular strength and body composition in cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy: a meta-analysis.J Cancer Surviv. 2017 Jun;11(3):339-349. doi: 10.1007/s11764-016-0592-x. Epub 2017 Jan 4. J Cancer Surviv. 2017. PMID: 28054255 Review.
Cited by
-
Training Programs Designed for Muscle Hypertrophy in Bodybuilders: A Narrative Review.Sports (Basel). 2020 Nov 18;8(11):149. doi: 10.3390/sports8110149. Sports (Basel). 2020. PMID: 33218168 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Manipulating Resistance Training Variables to Induce Muscle Strength and Hypertrophy: A Brief Narrative Review.Int J Exerc Sci. 2022 Jul 1;15(4):910-933. doi: 10.70252/VYUB3717. eCollection 2022. Int J Exerc Sci. 2022. PMID: 36157335 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Weekly Training Frequency Effects on Strength Gain: A Meta-Analysis.Sports Med Open. 2018 Aug 3;4(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s40798-018-0149-9. Sports Med Open. 2018. PMID: 30076500 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Should Competitive Bodybuilders Ingest More Protein than Current Evidence-Based Recommendations?Sports Med. 2019 Oct;49(10):1481-1485. doi: 10.1007/s40279-019-01111-y. Sports Med. 2019. PMID: 31028659
-
Effect of Resistance Training Frequency on Gains in Muscular Strength: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Sports Med. 2018 May;48(5):1207-1220. doi: 10.1007/s40279-018-0872-x. Sports Med. 2018. PMID: 29470825
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous